A Survey of Instructional Strategies used by Primary School Teachers for the attainment of Millennium Development Goals in Basic Mathematics

IntroductionB
The purpose of general education is to provide richC
and significant experiences in the major aspects ofD
living. This is directed so as to promote the fullestE
possible realization of personal potentialities and theTOTAL
most effective participation in a democratic society.%
The contributory role of basic mathematics curriculumGroup work
in achieving these laudable goals cannot be over20
emphasized especially in the primary school. This is25
why there is much emphasis on mathematics as a21
core subject in the primary and secondary school19
levels of education in Nigeria (FGN 2004). Mathematics23
as a bedrock of science and technology and as a108
school subject is recognized as the foundation27
without which a nation cannot become prosperousDrill
and economically dependent (Umonyang, 1997).This24
underscores the significance of the mathematical18
competence of all the learners at basic level of20
education, at the same time the need for teachers23
to make learning of mathematics more interesting to20
the learner  is imperative. In order words, good105
teaching should begin with the teacher having a clear,26.2
mental way of the exact changes he has to bringParticipatory
about in the learner.6
Mathematics is a tool used in the daily lives of the9
individual. Every daily activity of man requires the10
knowledge and use of mathematics inquiry needed9
for action learning to take place which will help6
learners to develop essential 21st century skills40
through relevant and authentic content and contexts10
in the MDG. Agwagah, (1996) stressed the importantDemonstration
role of mathematics and mathematics teachers in6
national development in actualising the needs of the7
learner and society in MDG programmes. Teachers'5
method of instruction has not been effective in8
meeting the needs of this national development in8
Nigeria. Teacher instructional strategies especially at34
the foundation level of teaching and learning is a vital8.5
aspect of the nation's productively independentConversation
(Okolo, 2000).3
Research reports (Bruner, 1996, Darling-Hammond4
& Snyder, 1992) have indicated that changes are3
necessary in the way mathematics is been handled.7
The traditional method of instruction does not relate6
mathematical problems to the real world, help23
students think about realistic situations, or help5.8
students to generate and pose their own solutions.Inquiry modelling
As a result, students may become unmotivated to4
learn and unconnected with what the teacher is doing5
in the classroom, developing an overall negative7
attitude towards mathematics.5
At the primary school level, there is need for7
teachers to make learning of mathematics more28
interesting to the learner (pupils) by using good and7.0
varied instructional strategies which the teacherClass audience
adopt and use to facilitate learning of abstract7
concepts, by helping to conceptualize ideas and4
stimulate the learners' imagination; they are known to5
increase the learners' active participation in the6
learning of mathematics. The use of varying6
instruction strategies in mathematics helps both the28
teacher and students in understanding each other.7
Since instructional strategies are so important, itIndependent study
becomes necessary that teachers learn to make use10
of effective and appropriate instructional method for8
the success of the Millennium Development Goal 
(MDG) programme. Some MDG scope and objective9
are extension of Universal Basic Education (UBE) to3
respond to World global reforms. Nigeria adopted a4
National Economic Empowerment and Development34
Strategy (NEEDs) in 2004, seeking to implement the8.5
UBE law in order to provide better schools andTable 3 shows the structure of instructional
trained teachers and trainers (Okebukola, 2005). MDGstrategies used by teachers in teaching the students
was initiated by Federal Government of Nigeria, toin the basic mathematics curriculum of MDG
achieve its laudable goals as follows:programme. The frequencies of each of the
- Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger,instruction as used by teachers in teaching the pupils
- Achieve universal primary education,are as shown according to LGAs (zones). The total
- Promote gender equality and empower womenfrequencies of occurrence of each instruction are as
- Reduce child mortalityshown in the last column. These frequencies show
- Improve maternal healththat group work and drill methods had the highest
- Combat HIV and AIDS, malaria, and other diseasesnumber of occurrence for teaching the students with
- Ensure environmental sustainability108(27%) and 105(26.2%) respectively. This is
- Develop a global partnership for developmentfollowed by participatory approach with a total
Hence good instructional method of teachers isfrequency of 40(10%). The next is the
needed in our basic mathematics. The country needdemonstration and independent study strategies with
to make this a priority to make MDG goals come tothe frequency of 34(8.5%) each. Inquiry and class
reality. The purpose of this paper is to evaluateaudience strategies have the least frequencies of
instructional strategies used by primary schooloccurrence of 28(7%) each. Table 4 shows the
teachers for the attainment of MDG in basicanalysis of instructional strategies used for teaching
mathematicsbasic mathematics in primary schools.
  
The results of findings are as stated in tables:Hypothesis 1: There is no significant difference
Question1: What are the characteristics of teachersbetween the instructional strategies used by teachers
who participated in the basic mathematics of MDG?of public and private primary schools in basic
The demographic variables of teachers in Ekiti Statemathematics
public and private primary schools are as stated inTable 4: Chi-Square analysis of the Instructional
table 1.strategies used in Public and Private Primary Schools
Table 1: Teachers characteristic used for the basicMethods
mathematics in public and private primary schoolPublic
CharacteristicsPrivate
GenderTotaldfcaltab
MaleRmk
FemaleGroup work
 168(56)
Public: (n=300)81
 137
50(30) 
250(150) 
% attendance 
  
60 
607
Private:(n=100) 
  
14(6) 
86(28) 
% attendance 
 138.7
42.86 
32.56 
  
Total:(N=400) 
  
64(36)14.01
336(178) 
% attendance 
  
56.25 
52.98 
 Significant
TotalDrill
300(180)165(55)
6073
100(34)128
34%Participatory
400(214)120(40)
52.564
Experience104
 Demonstration
0-5114(38)
6-1053
>1091
 Conversation
 76(25)
90(40)39
80(30)64
130(70)Inquiry
 96(32)
 47
 79
 Class audience
80(20)99(33)
20(12)49
 82
 Independent study
 105(35)
 55
 90
170(60)Total
100(42)314
130(70)461
 775
35.29 
42Table 4 shows the chi-square c (138.7) > table
53.85(14.07). Hence the hypothesis is rejected. Therefore,
Totalthere is significant difference between the
300(140)instructional strategies used by teachers in public and
46.67private primary schools in the MDG programme.
100(32)Hypothesis2: There is no significant difference
32between public and private schools teachers in the
400(172)awareness, understanding and usage of the MDG
43.00Curriculum.
QualificationTable 5 shows the difference in the awareness,
 understanding and the usage of MDG curriculum.
TC11Table 5: Awareness, understanding and the usage of
NCEMDG curriculum in Public and Private Schools
BSc Ed/BEdCategories %
OthersPublic(n=300)
 Private(n=100)
 Df
40(15) 
70(40) 
120(60)Rmk
70(32)Have the MDG curriculum in mathematics
 61.5
 31.3
  
  
 3
20(6) 
50(20) 
25(5)18.32
5(0) 
  
 7.82
  
  
 Sig
 Understand curriculum
60(21)48.4
120(60)54.6
145(65)Use the curriculum
75(32)35.36
 63.67
 Understand the purpose of MDG
 41.16
3546.74
 Table 5 shows the chi-square X2c (18.32) >
50X2t(7.82). Hence the hypothesis is rejected.
 Therefore there is significant difference between the
44.83public and private school teachers in the awareness,
 understanding and usage of the basic mathematics
42.67curriculum. By implication the private schools teachers
Totalhas more understanding and use the curriculum of
300(147)the MDG better than the public schools, though the
49.00public teachers have more copies of the curriculum
100(31)more than the private schools teachers.
31.00 
400(178)Hypothesis3: There is no significant influence of
44.50teacher's instructional strategies on the achievement
Marital Statusof basic mathematics curriculum for MDG programme.
 Table 6: Influence of teachers' instructional strategies
Singleon achievement of basic Mathematics curriculum
MarriedCategories
 Public n=300
 Private n=100
65(32)Total
235(76) 
  
 25.7
49.23 
32.34 
 3.84
  
69(24)Influenced
31(7)195
 63
 258
34.78Do not influence
 105
22.5837
 142
 Total
 300
134(56)100
266(83)400
  
 Table 6 shows that cal 25.7 was greater than
  table3.84 at α=0.05 level of significance. Therefore
41.79the hypothesis is rejected. This implies that there is
 significant difference in the influence of teacher's
31.20instructional strategies and the achievement of basic
Totalmathematics curriculum for MDG programme
300(108) 
36Discussion
100(31)The study revealed some differences in the
31.00characteristics of teachers of public and private
400(139)schools in terms of experience, qualification and
34.95marital status. High proportion of teachers in private
No of teachers who participated in the MDGschools had lower educational qualification. This calls
programme are shown in the parenthesesfor proper monitoring of standard in the employment
Table 1 shows the number of teachers who hadof teachers in the private schools since most of the
attended the MDG programme in Ekiti State publicNigerian children will spend there basic years in these
and private schools. Male and female teachers inschools. This finding was corroborated by
public schools have the same chance of attendanceMeremikwu& Enukoha (2006) &NCTM
of 60% each. In the private primary schools, only(2000) who reiterated a good standard for school
42.86% of male have attended with 32.56% femalemaths at basic level.
teachers in attendance. The overall attendance ofFurther findings of this study showed that MDG
teachers in public schools was found to be 60%,curriculum is not well wildly used in public schools, but
while that of private schools was 34%. On theare used in private schools. Since, they do not
whole, 56.25% of male teachers have attended sounderstand the purpose of MDG programme. The
far with 52.98% of female teachers in both publicMDG programme stressed the need to develop
and private primary schools.national curriculum modules for primary and junior
The highest percentage of the experience ofsecondary education in line with MDG programme.
teachers who have been on service for more thanThe reason why during the long vacation, teachers
10 years was found to be 53.85% in public schools.are organised and trained in the use and adaptation
This is closely followed by those who have been onof the modules from the national curriculum through
service between the last 5 years of 44.44%. Whileworkshop, seminars and meeting on curriculum
the list of teachers who have their experiencedelivery. This in effect will improve student's
between 6-10 years was found to be 37.50% in achievement with a functional basic educational
private schools, teachers who have been on servicecurriculum. The study also showed that many
between 6-10% had the highest percentage. This isteachers of both public and private schools do not
closely followed by teachers have the experienceuse some of instructional methods needed for the
between 0-5 years of 44.44%. It was found thatbasic needs of the learners in mathematics. It was
there was no teacher of 10 years and abovealso found that only few methods were used for the
teaching experience. In overall, teachers who haveteaching of basic mathematics. The findings of the
been on service for more than 10 years had thestudy also revealed significant influence of
majority of attendance with 53.85%. This is closelyinstructional strategies in the advancement of basic
followed by those between 6-10 years of teachingmathematics. Hence, researchers (Kolawole, 2004;
service. Teachers with 5 years teaching experienceDarling-Hammond, 1996; UNESCO&ISESCO, 2001)
had the least percentage of attendance of 35.29%.Inhave discovered major problems facing mathematics
all, public teachers had the majority of attendance inteaching in terms of teachers methods and called for
the MDG programme of 46.67%,while private schoolteachers training and re-training as a way of
teachers had 32%consolidate and enlarge concepts and skills of
Majority of teachers who hold National Certificate inteachers in the teaching process. When teachers do
Education (NCE) (57.14%) in public primary schoolsnot use appropriate instructional strategies, they are
have attended the MDG programme, followed closelyless likely to achieve the desire learning outcomes.
by those with bachelors in education degreeHence, instructional strategies are an important of
(45.71%). Teacher grade11 had the least percentageachieving the basic mathematics curriculum meant for
of attendance of 37.50%. This shows that majorityMDG programmes.
of teachers in private schools who have attendedConclusion and Recommendations
the programme had NCE of 40%. Follow by grade 11There is need to widely spread the use of MDG
teachers of 30%. Teachers who have bachelors incurriculum through proper monitoring in both public
education had the least percentage of attendance ofand private primary schools to build capacity for the
20%. In overall, NCE teachers of both public andMDG at the foundation and basic level in core
private schools have the highest attendance of 50%,subjects such as mathematics and science. Modules
this is followed by those with bachelors of educationfor teaching mathematics are not always readily
degree 44.83% This is followed closely by those whoavailable for primary schools despite the emphasis of
have other qualifications (42.67%). Teacher grade11the MDG plan. Availability of these in both public and
had the least percentage of attendance of 35%. Inprivate schools will help to build good foundation for
all, public school teachers had the highest percentageNigerian pupils in the important subjects like
of attendance of 49% and only 31% of the teachersmathematics.
in public schools have attended the programme with 
49.23%. 
Only 32.34% of married teachers have attended the 
programme with 34.78% of single teachers in private 
schools. This is closely followed by married teachers 
of 22.58%. Overall, single teachers had the highestReferences
percentage of attendance of 41.79%, while onlyAgwagah, U.N.V. (1996). Instructional deficiency in
31.20% married teachers have attended so far. Thesome secondary school maths topics; challenge of
overall teachers who have attended was found to bemaths educators for future maths education. A paper
36% in public schools. The study also shows that onlypresented at the 33rd annual conference of
31% of teachers in private schools have attendedmathematical association of Nigeria.(MAN).
the MDG programme. Table 2 shows teachers'Burner, J(1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New
awareness, understanding and usage of basicYork; Norton
mathematics curriculum in primary schools.Darling – Hammond, L & Snyder, J (1992)
Question 2: Are teachers aware of the usage ofConclusion study and the traditions of inquiry; the
basic mathematics curriculum of MDG programme?scientific tradition. In P.W Jackson (Ed), Handbook of
Table 2: Awareness, understanding and usage ofresearch and curriculum. P. 41-78. New York; Macmillan
basic mathematics curriculum of MDG programmeDarling-Hammond,I(1996) what matters most; a
Categories %competent teacher for every child ; Quality Teaching
Public(n=300)for the 21st Century. Kappan Phi Dilta 78(3); 173-200.
% 
Private(n=100)Dugdale ,S(1990). Beyond the evident contnt goals
%pant111. An undercurrent- enhanced approach to
Have the MDG curriculum in mathematicstrigonometric identities. Journal of Mathematical
300(185)Behaviour. 9; 233-287
61.67 
100(31)Federal Republic of Nigeria (2004) National Policy on
31Education
Understand curriculumJaworski, B (1994). Investigating Mathematics
300(144)Teaching. London; Falmer
48Meremikwu, A,N& Enukoha, I.O(2006). Primary
100(51)mathematics instructional aids and universal basic
55education in Nigeria. Mathematical association of
Use the curriculumNigeria (MAN) proceed of annual national conference
300(109)Mousley, J, Lambdin, D & Koc,Y(2003).
36.33Mathematics teachers education and technology, in
100(64)Bishop,N. A et.al (edu) second International Handbook
64of Mathematics Education; Dordrecht; Kluwer.
Understand the purpose of MDGNational Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000)
300(123)Principle and standards for school mathematics
41(NCTM).Reston.V.A
100(47)Okebukola, P (2005). Enhancing the relevance of
47STAN to national development. Memorial lecture
 NOTE of STAN at the 46th National Conference
Table 2 shows that more than half (185) 61.67% ofOkolo, U.P (2006). The challenges of Universal Basic
the teachers in public schools have the MDGEducation (UBE). The role of secondary mathematics.
curriculum in mathematics, while only 31% of teachersPaper presented at the 43rd Annual Conference of
in private schools used the basic mathematicsMathematical Association of Nigeria (MAN) Bauchi;
curriculum in primary schools. Private school teachersNigeria. P1-13
understand the purpose of using the curriculumOkoye F.N (2000). Strategies for improving the
better (54.6%) than public schools (47%). Both publicteaching of mathematics in secondary school in E.C
(41%) and private (47%) schools teachers couldIloputaife (ed) effective science and computer
understand the purpose of MDG curriculum as showneducation in the new millennium. Enugu; science and
in table 2.Table 3 shows the structure of instructionalcomputer education department, Enugu state
strategies used by teachersuniversity of technology
  
Question3: Is there any difference in the structure ofThompson, A (1984). The relationship of teachers
instructional strategies used in basic mathematicsconception of mathematics and mathematics teaching
curriculum for MDG programme?instructional practice. Educational study in
Table 3: Frequency of the structure of instructionalmathematics.15 (2); 105-127 Dordrecht: Reidel.
strategies used by teachers in bothUmonyang, IE (1997) Maximizing student's
Public and private primary schoolsachievement in mathematics thought multi- grade
Structureclassroom teaching approach; paper presented at the
Zones40th national conference of Science Teacher
 Association of Nigeria (STAN) p.
A