Do You Really Want to End Poverty in the US and English Speaking Nations?

We often see articles in newspapers or magazinespreventing and correcting errors made by illiterate
about the shocking extent of poverty in America orworkers, and (3) the reduction in sales of reading
some other English-speaking nation. But how often domaterials, higher education courses, and more
the articles examine the cause of the poverty? Iexpensive and luxury items.
cannot remember ever seeing such an article. ManyA study of the changes made in the method used to
persons of influence -- celebrities, educators, andteach reading and the results achieved by these
politicians -- bemoan the extent of poverty. Many ofchanges prove that there have not been any
them want to help. Some of them actually do help,statistically significant improvements in the last eighty
but the help is almost always something involvingyears or more. Most of the changes made have
providing money or physical items to temporarilycome as a result of the 1983 "Nation At Risk" report
relieve the symptoms -- the pain and sufferingstating that if a foreign nation had imposed upon us
brought on by poverty. It is almost never somethingour 1983 education system, we would have
which will enable those in poverty to permanentlyconsidered it an act of war.
escape their poverty. It is like the saying, "Give aMost American school children of normal intelligence
man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a manrequire a minimum of two years to learn to read. Dr.
to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."Frank Laubach, who taught adults to read in over 313
Using this analogy, in order to teach a man to fish (i.e.alphabetic languages (and even invented spelling
escape poverty through his own actions), you havesystems for scores of language groups who had no
to understand what is causing him to be in poverty.written language) found that in 98% of the
Otherwise, any help you provide will merely fight thelanguages in which he taught, he could teach them to
symptoms of the problem rather than solving theread and write fluently in less than three months. In
problem. It is like giving someone aspirin to relieve thesome of the simplest languages, such as one or more
pain of pneumonia rather than antibiotics to end thedialects of the Philippine language, he found that they
pneumonia.could learn to read in one hour! Dr. Laubach stated on
The most statistically accurate and thorough study ofpage 48 of his book, Forty Years With the Silent
English functional illiteracy ever commissioned by theBillion, "If we spelled English phonetically, American
U.S. government was a five-year, $14 million studychildren could be taught to read in a week." As far as
involving lengthy interviews of 26,049 U.S. adults. Thegrammar and syntax are concerned, English is neither
interviewees were statistically balanced for age,the easiest nor the most difficult. One week may be
gender, ethnicity, and location (urban, suburban, orsomewhat optimistic, but the grammar and syntax of
rural in a dozen states and several prisons across theEnglish is easier than many European languages, all of
U.S.) to represent the entire U.S. population. Thiswhose speakers learn to read in less than three
study, titled Adult Literacy in America, proves thatmonths.
48.7% of U.S. adults (over 93 million of them) areThere are more than 1.3 billion English-speaking people
functionally illiterate (i.e. they read and write so poorlyaround the world, more than speak any language
that they cannot hold an above-poverty-level-wagedialect other Mandarin Chinese. The vast majority of
job) and proves they are more than twice as likelyMandarin Chinese speakers live in China. English is used
to be in poverty because of functional illiteracy as formore than any other language to speak to someone
all other reasons combined.who does not understand the speaker's native
The U.S. Census Bureau reports a much higherdialect. It is estimated that 600 million of the
literacy rate, but if you see how the literacy rateEnglish-speaking people worldwide (including over 93
that they report was obtained, you will undoubtedlymillion in the U.S. alone) are functionally illiterate.
agree with Jonathan Kozol (who describes thePeople who are honest in evaluating the serious
literacy rate determination process in his shockingphysical, mental, emotional, medical, and financial
book Illiterate America) that the reported figureproblems of illiterates and the extent of English
vastly overestimates the literacy rate -- and thefunctional illiteracy of English-speaking people will have
Adult Literacy in America report proves it. Althoughto admit that the many half-measures we have been
there is no evidence of deliberate falsification of theusing for the last eighty years are only fighting the
literacy rate, it is in the short term best interest ofsymptoms of the problem, not solving the problem.
educators and politicians to believe the rosy reportsIf we had to endure the problems that functional
of our literacy rate.illiterates must constantly live with, we would consider
Believing that we are much more literate than weour problems a crisis.
actually are, however, alleviates any necessity of theLiteracy Research Associates, Inc. and NuEnglish, Inc.,
drastic action needed to solve the problem. Insteadtwo non-profit educational corporations, have
we just continue to treat the symptoms of pain andresearched and perfected a system that Dr. Laubach
suffering to the illiterates and the continued high cost(now deceased) would undoubtedly advocate to
to every U.S. adult. Functional illiteracy costs everysolve our literacy problems -- the only proven solution
adult -- reader and non-reader alike -- an average ofknown to be available. It has been proven in over
$5186 each year for (1) government programs that300 alphabetic languages, but never tried in English.
illiterates use, (2) for truancy, juvenile delinquency,Do you REALLY want to help end poverty in the U.S.
and crime directly related to illiteracy, and (3) theand other English-speaking nations? If so, please fight
higher cost of consumer goods as a result ofto effect a cure for illiteracy, rather than fighting the
functional illiterates in the workplace. The higher costsymptoms of illiteracy -- the pain and suffering and
of consumer goods results from (1) higher costs forpoverty that illiterates must constantly endure.
recruiting and training employees, (2) the cost of