Don't Fire the Teachers - Retrain the Kids' Learning Abilities

Teachers are in a hotbed now. Not only are salariesvisual deficiencies can be pinpointed as to severity.
and teaching positions frozen, but many are beingClassrooms can then have a fair distribution of ability
fired due to budget constraints. School Districts andlevels dispersed between classes.
Schools, not knowing how to get a handle on whomAny teacher should not be unlucky enough to inherit
to show the door, have tied standardized testinga classroom full of low performers, and then be fired
classroom scores to teacher worthiness andbecause they were tough to teach and failed to
instructional excellence.obtain immediate test results.
Teachers are being asked to "re-teach" what childrenMy own research demonstrated that a classroom of
have not learned: like basic math facts, generallylow performing fourth graders did not obtain a
taught in the third grade. With specific curriculumchange in standardized test scores immediately
requirements for each grade level, it is difficult to gofollowing a strong intervention. The results appeared
back and continually review, and then have enougha year later, when the students' scores were
time to teach the necessary basic skills for thatreconfigured, and it was discovered there was
particular grade level.sometimes a latency effect with slow learners. Two
To top it all off, teachers, grades four and up, areyears' later these two low-achieving classes passed
forced to spend several hours daily, four days aup a group of gifted students, achievement
week, to teach the standardized test mechanisms.score-wise because of my intervention.
This is not subject matter-content instruction; it isMoreover, should we fire the unlucky teacher who
merely test-taking mechanics on how to choose ahad to wait a full year to see results from her own
multiple choice answer and move through the examexcellent teaching? And, ironically, the subsequent
in a certain amount of time. Struggling students oftenteacher receives applause and a bonus for the work
sit with a higher-ability level peer and mimicthe former teacher conducted?
test-taking actions, not understanding the concept.Concurrently, students' learning abilities are not
What is not taken into consideration is that classroompredetermined, and the myriad of drill and practice
student ability level composition varies from room tosubject matter computerized programs while they do
room. One class may have more "struggling" studentssome good, do not remedy the information
than another, placing that teacher at a disadvantageprocessing shortcomings. That is why we are caught
compared to another class of higher ability students.up in this academic achievement dilemma.
What is missing here is that each student's abilityWe spend time practicing the mechanics for
level should be pre-tested in the early elementarystandardized tests, do not learn the subject matter,
grades, and carefully followed by the parents andnor are we retraining cognitive abilities so every child
teachers. That way, learning progress can be tracked.can be an efficient learner. With systematic early
Private assessment consultants can be identified forstudent ability retraining, teachers would be able to
parents' engagement, and brief group cognitive skillsteach, students would learn what they are taught,
standardized test batteries can be administered byachievement test scores would systematically raise,
the school in early elementary years. Listening andand teachers will not have to be fired.