"Johnny Can't Read" Goes to College

ding to an ACT college entrance exam study,In private 2-year colleges, 26 percent of entering
three-fourths of students who took the ACT in 2006students were enrolled in a remedial course.
lacked the skills to succeed in entry-level,
It is clear that remediation is a widespread
credit-bearing college courses in reading, math, socialnecessity in U.S. community colleges. Forty-one
studies and science, even though they had taken apercent of first-time community college students
high school curriculum designed to prepare them forenroll in remedial courses. Over 1.2 million students
higher education.annually participate in community college remediation,
During the 2003-04 school year, according to a 2006and 99 percent of the nation’s public 2-year
report by the National Center for Education Statisticsinstitutions offer remedial courses.
(NCES), more than a third of first- and second-yearAnd these estimates are conservative! According to
undergraduates reported taking a remedial course.the State Higher Education Executive Officers, only
The Alliance for Excellent Education, a nonprofitabout half of U.S. states require remediation
group, reported in 2006 that community collegesassessment and placement. Consequently, the figures
alone spend $1.4 billion annually on remedial coursesinclude only those students who placed into remedial
for recent high school graduates. The group alsocourses and took them, not those who may have
noted that community colleges, like public schools, arequalified but avoided it. (Remedial Courses: Estimates
subsidized by taxes.of Student Participation and the Volume of
Although the most common remediation methodRemediation in U.S. Community Colleges Prepared for
used by community colleges was the remedialThe League for Innovation in the Community College,
course, they employed other methods, includingby Hunter R. Boylan and D. Patrick Saxon, National
tutoring programs, computerized learning laboratories,Center for Developmental Education)
and learning assistance programs that featured aCost
variety of individualized programs. In 1992, accordingBecause too many high school students are not
to the National Study of Developmental Education,learning the basic skills needed to succeed in college
over 90 percent of U.S. community colleges usedor work, the nation loses more than $3.7 billion a
these additional methods to supplement or substituteyear. This includes $1.4 billion to provide remedial
for remedial courses.education to recent high school graduates, as well as
In addition, an estimated 700,000 students, manythe almost $2.3 billion that the economy loses
attending community colleges, were served bybecause remedial reading students are more likely to
federally funded TRIO Programs, which provide non-drop out of college, thereby reducing their earning
course-based remediation (Boylan, 1995).potential.
Consequently, the study actually underestimated,Of those who enter high school in the United States,
perhaps by a significant margin, the number ofonly about 70 percent will graduate—one of
students receiving some form of remediation in thethe lowest rates among industrialized nations (Greene
nation’s community colleges.& Winters, 2006). Equally important is the fact
1998 NCES data indicated that in Fall 1995, 41 percentthat, of those who do receive a diploma, only half
of 963,000 first-time public community collegeare academically prepared for postsecondary
students were enrolled in at least one remedialeducation (Greene & Winters, 2005). A recent
course. Twenty-six percent of 56,000 first-timestudy of high school juniors and seniors taking the
private community college students took a remedialACT confirms this; only half were ready for
class. These percentages total 409,390 first-timecollege-level reading in math, history, science, and
community college students that took one or moreEnglish (ACT, 2006).
remedial courses in Fall 1995.Despite these daunting statistics, the vast majority
Enrollment figures at one school, Jackson Communityof America’s high school students are
College, reveal the trend that the number ofoptimistic about their prospects for the future, which
students requiring instruction and support in readingthey anticipate includes both higher education and
has been increasing in recent years. In 2001-02, therewarding careers. In fact, according to a recent
school enrolled 257 students in the remedial coursenational survey, 81 percent of high school students
English 085: College Reading. In 2005-06, 499 studentsexpect to attend college (High School Survey of
were enrolled.Student Engagement, 2005). This goal is wise, since
Enrollment decline at Jackson CC is also indicative of80 percent of the fastest-growing jobs in the U.S.
a lack of postsecondary preparation. Total enrollmentrequire at least some postsecondary education (U.S.
for Fall 2006 was 6,173. By Winter 2007, enrollmentDepartment of Labor, 2005).
was just 4,124. (Literacy Coaching, Service LearningStudents and their families pay approximately $283
& Literacy: Jackson Community College, Ameliamillion in community college tuition, one-fifth of the
Gamel).overall cost of remediation. But there’s
In September 1993, the U.S. Department ofanother cost - time. Students’ time could be
Education released the most detailed portrait everbetter spent taking college-level courses, which would
available on the condition of illiteracy in the Unitedadvance their goals and increase their earning
States. The National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS)potential. And because many colleges do not offer
evaluated the skills of adults in three areas ofcredit for remedial courses, students are expending
proficiency: prose, document, and quantitative.energy on study that, while necessary, delays their
Results showed:quest for a degree.
• 23% - 25% (40 to 44 million adults) wereIndividual states, and the nation as a whole, are not
at Level 1, the lowest of five levels. This group is theonly paying to remediate thousands of young adults,
Adult Literacy Service's primary targetbut are risking future financial loss because students
population—those identified as functionallywho need remediation are more likely to leave
illiterate.college without a degree, becoming more likely to
• 25% - 28% (50 million adults) were at Levelearn less than if they had gotten a college diploma.
2. According to the Executive Summary, "While theirResearch shows that the leading predictor that a
skills were more varied than those of individuals instudent will drop out of college is the need for
Level 1, their repertoire was still quite limited."remedial reading. While 58 percent of students who
The survey also found literacy proficiencies of youngtake no remedial education courses earn a
adults to be somewhat lower, on average, than theBachelor’s degree within eight years, only 17
proficiencies of young adults who participated in apercent of students who enroll in a remedial reading
similar study in 1985 by the National Assessment ofcourse receive a BA or BS within the same time
Educational Progress.period (NCES, 2004).
The statistics are clear; illiteracy is on the rise in theThe wages of individuals with only some college
United States!experience average about $20,171 less each year
The Office of Technology Assessment (OAT), anthan graduates. Furthermore, when students drop
analytical arm of the U.S. Congress, stated in a 1993out, not only do they lose future income, but
report:governments lose tax revenue, and state and
"Standards and requirements for literacy havenational economies are deprived of additional earnings
increased over time and a large number of adultsthat would make them more robust.
need to improve their literacy skills. OAT finds that atHowever, the real price of college remediation is likely
least 35 million adults have difficulty with commonmuch higher than this. The estimate does not include
literacy tasks. Although many of these adults canthe costs of remediation for students attending public
read at rudimentary levels, they need higher levels ofor private four-year colleges, or for older community
literacy to function effectively in society, to findcollege students. Nor does it count other, non-
employment, or to be trained for new jobs as thecommunity college-related remediation expenditures.
workplace changes... Fewer than 10% of theThere are additional costs. Employers must pay for
population in need is being reached."training programs to teach basic skills or purchase
According to the American Council on Education,technology to compensate for a lack of these skills.
first-time students comprised only about 56 percentNonprofits and government agencies as well, pay for
of those taking remedial courses at any given time. Aadult literacy training, technology, and other academic
large number of enrollees in remedial courses includedand occupational skills. (Paying Double: Inadequate
students repeating a remedial course, those unable toHigh Schools and Community College Remediation,
register for one in their first semester, and those2006)
who delayed taking remedial courses until later in theirFor faster, less costly remedial education, more and
college careers. Assuming that this 56 percentmore parents and adult learners are turning to
represented 409,390 first-time students, the totalself-directed courses like literacy pod to supplement
estimate for remedial course enrollees in Fall 1995what they and/or their children are not getting in the
was 731,054.school system or through other forms of group
Since enrollment figures for Spring 1996 were notinstruction. This is especially true of reading. Too
available, an estimate was used to comparemany school systems have turned away from
remediation enrollment in Fall/Spring 1995-96.phonics-based reading instruction to other methods
Experience suggested that slightly more communitythat have proven ineffective.
college students took remedial courses in Fall 1995Why Johnny Can't Read (1955) and Why Johnny Still
(60%) than Spring 1996 (40%).Can't Read (1981), by Rudolf Franz Flesch, raised
An estimate, therefore, of the number of studentspublic awareness of a planned illiteracy (Chapter 2
taking one or more remedial courses at some point"History of a Gimmick", Chapter 4 "The Great Cover
during Fall/Spring 1995-96 was 1,218,422. Thisup") which could never have happened had our
estimate included an unknown number of studentsparents known the alphabetic code. The best way to
who took one or more remedial courses in the fallend just about anything is to let everyone know all
and had to repeat one or more of them during theabout it.
spring.Previous U.S Presidents poured billions of dollars and
Given that some of these 1,218,422 students wereplaced millions of volunteers into schools. But that
taking more than one remedial course, the actualwon't solve the "illiteracy scam." The government
number of registrations was somewhat higher duringdiverted attention away from phonics in favor of the
this period. Moreover, the estimate included only"whole language" method, by requiring it under
courses in reading, writing, and mathematics.President Clinton's Goals 2000 program. Research in
NCES reported, for example, that 36 percent of thereading instruction shows conclusively, however, that
nation’s public community colleges offeredthe "whole language" method does not work.
remedial courses in general science, biology,The National Institute of Child Health and Human
chemistry, and physics. This is consistent with theDevelopment spent more than $1.2 billion in research
1992 National Study of Developmental Education,to prove that phonics is the best way to teach
which found that remedial science courses werereading. In fact, it has been proven repeatedly that
offered in about a third of U. S. community colleges.direct, systematic instruction about the alphabetic
Generally regarded as the most reliable recent studycode is the most powerful weapon in the fight
on remediation in higher education, a 1996 NCESagainst illiteracy. Any responsible linguist, teacher,
survey during Fall 1995 used the Postsecondaryparent, or cognitive scientist in the research
Education Quick Information System to survey 847community would agree. However, Don't Be Fooled
randomly selected American higher educationBy Fake Phonics; but that's another article.
institutions. A major finding was that 41 percent ofJohnny is off to college, but first he may want to
the students entering public community colleges in Fallmake a stop at a self-directed remedial course to
1995 were enrolled in one or more remedial courses.help ensure his success.