Nitwit Nation: Is America Too Dumb for Democracy?

Most Americans are enthusiastic supporters of theirsame: the vast quantity of television Americans
own civic rights, but few bother to meet anywatch leaves virtually no time (at least during the
would-be democrat's (or any would-be republican's, ifworkweek) for anything else -- no time to read,
you prefer) number-one responsibility: that of keepingwrite, or cipher anything unrelated to our jobs or
oneself sufficiently literate and well informed to bemaybe a favorite hobby or two. And so we become
able to vote rationally and knowledgeably. Mountainsa nitwit nation, with most of its citizens comfortable
of too-long ignored evidence show that the vastoperating within their own little worlds of work,
majority of our nation's citizens cannot possibly meetfamily, TV, familiar social activities, and errands, but
that responsibility -- that their functional literacies areself-deprived of the time necessary to practice the
so limited that our form of government can'tart of thinking and acting like a citizen.
accurately be called a "democracy." The word, rather,One wonders what our republic might be like if its
is "ochlocracy": government based on the uninformedconstituents suddenly saw fit to struggle by on only,
passions and whims of the mob.say, three hours of TV time per day, and gave the
In 1988, the United States Congress mandated aremaining hour to something more enlightening. If the
massive study on adult literacy in America. Some ofunthinkable were to happen and we were to
the nation's most highly esteemed testing anddisengage from our tubes once in awhile, how might
evaluation specialists fanned out across the country,we best hone and exercise the essential skills we
interviewing and testing literally thousands of citizens,need to cast responsible ballots?
young and old, rich and poor, educated and not. TheHow about reading some mind-stretching books?
result, published in 1993 as "Adult Literacy inThose who like to sentimentalize books in general
America," showed that at least 96 percent oftend to gush naive nonsense, and the old saying that
America's adults were unlikely to be able to performit doesn't matter what you read as long as you read
tasks that one might think preposterously simple.something is the purest idiocy. It couldn't possibly
Specifically, the study showed that only tinymatter more. Americans are tremendous buyers and
percentages of us can dependably do such things asreaders of books (on weekends, perhaps) but the
(1) read and demonstrate basic comprehension of adominant varieties are genre fiction and self-help
1-page juror information sheet; (2) peruse and explainbooks. Those may be fine for what they are, but
essential elements presented on a 1-page printedhow they'll strengthen the Union -- or their readers'
table such as one might receive at a school boardbasic literacies -- is beyond me.
meeting; or (3) explain how to solve a simpleSo what "should" a citizen of the republic be reading?
consumer arithmetic problem.A little bit of everything -- because in a democracy,
Subsequent studies (such as the Organisation forone needs to know at least a little bit about pretty
Economic Co-operation and Development 's "Literacymuch everything. We need to read that which might
in the Information Age," published in 2000), tend tomake us more mentally agile and better informed
confirm the general impression one is left with after aabout our world, be it works of science, history,
close reading of "Adult Literacy in America": that weeconomics, quality literature ... the choices are endless,
as a people simply don't have the kinds of tooland we need to say yes to as many of them as
knowledge and basic skills necessary to sustain anypossible, as often as we possibly can. In a
democracy worthy of the name. In other words, asdemocracy, functional literacy demands promiscuous
citizens, the vast majority of Americans arereading, including but certainly not limited to books.
functionally illiterate.Apart from the fact that books can disseminate
"If you don't use it, you lose it," the saying goes, andessential information (which TV or the Net can,
that's a major reason we've come to this sorry pass:arguably, do more efficiently), there's another aspect
we're too busy doing other things to keep our mindsof reading them that makes our doing so essential to
from atrophying -- and one of those "other things"the health of the republic. Reading well-written books,
overshadows all the rest as our most villainous timeunlike watching most TV shows or cruising through a
thief. Let's do a little arithmetic. From the 24-hour daysuccession of websites, demands sustained and
we all start with, we'll subtract seven hours for thenuanced thought. It's easy to spend countless hours
abbreviated night's sleep that most of us get. Ourin front of the television or on the Internet without
workdays may be eight hours in theory, but theyever having to examine an idea of any consequence
often go longer, and then there's the commute,for more than a few seconds, if at all. When
work-related errands, etc., so subtract another ninedemocracy's working its hardest and best, it's a
hours. A day's meals, personal hygiene, and householddeeply involved and profoundly complicated
chores will consume about two more hours -- more ifenterprise. It requires that its practitioners focus on
meals (including preparation, consumption, andvexing problems, see many sides and shadings of a
cleanup) are permitted to last longer than 30 minutesgiven question, and a find creative and satisfying
each. A million other unpredictables (answering emailssolutions: precisely the kinds of mental processes one
or phone calls from friends or family, soccer practice,is led through over the course of most well-crafted,
car problems, surfing the Net, card club, a talkativedemanding books. Reading worthwhile books is a
neighbor -- whatever) will inevitably conspire toform of democratic calisthenics for the mind.
relieve us of a couple more. That leaves about fourSimply turning off our TVs and reading the best
available hours, give or take, per weekday.books we can find won't necessarily strengthen the
Care to guess how much TV Americans watch, onrepublic or heal the world. But it couldn't hurt, and our
average, every day? Could it be ... four hours? Yep.continued failure to do so is causing incalculable harm.
In 1961, FCC Chairman Newton Minnow famouslyDemocracy may be what we want, but until we as a
called TV a "vast wasteland." Maybe it was, maybe itpeople acquire the habit of stretching our minds a
is, maybe not. But let's leave questions of qualitywhole lot further than we presently do, ochlocracy is
aside for the moment. Whether one's TV viewingmost assuredly what we shall have.
choices are ridiculous or sublime, the arithmetic is the