Open Source Software in Higher Education

The higher education sector is quite unlike otherAs with any "open source" activity, open source
industries. It has its own processes and a differentcurricula by its very definition is one that can be
set of demands. Most commercial proprietaryfreely used, distributed and modified. A model like this
application vendors develop their applications focusedwould seemingly be antithetic to the concept of
on a wider domain spread across industries. This,higher education as it strikes at the credibility of the
academics complain, creates a distinct disconnecteducation environment. Campus education is designed
between software vendors and the end-users into operate as a structured learning methodology. The
academia.concept of community collaboration involving
To overcome these shortcomings, the educationacademics and students on the same platform brings
industry started looking to "open source" as ana lot of unpredictability into the scenario
alternate model. Around a decade back, institutionsHowever, FLOSS communities (Free/Libre and Open
started debating total cost of ownership in adoptingSource Software) in education have proved to be
an open source based community approachquite successful. A key principle of this learning
vis-à-vis proprietary applications, viability ofapproach is its root in adapting it to the context of
open source based business models, sustainability andones' experience. With its stress on learners and their
security issues.preferences, this learning approach focuses more on
The success of community developed open sourcelearning by collaboration, communication and sharing.
software is quite well established. Linux and ApacheSignificant initiatives include the Connexions Project at
are ample proof of its success. A similar trend,Rice University, the OpenCourseWare project at MIT
though not that widespread in its reach, can beand the social learning medium of Wikipedia.
traced to the development of community projects inThe FLOSS approach in higher education has been
education like the Moodle and Sakai.operating in combination with traditional teacher
Through the course of its formative years, the opencentered approaches. The objectives of the FLOSS
source community based approach in education hasapproach are not to replace traditional methods but
developed several alternative models. Some of theseto achieve synergies in combination and offer the
models and schools of thought have thrived andlearner an enhanced learning environment.
been implemented successfully across a significantThe 'FLOSS-like education transfer report' published in
spectrum of the industry. Progress and success inSeptember 2008, as part of the FLOSSCOM project,
open source projects like the Sakai, Moodle, Kuali,notes that FLOSS communities can create effective
uPortal, Shibboleth, and many more are being closelylearning environments. The study has also come up
watched by the industry.with three different approaches that could be
Community Source Modelcombined effectively with traditional teaching
One school of thought believes that open sourceapproaches.
sharing is more a philosophical approach than a viableEconomic Models of Open Source
alternative. The adoption of open source in higherOne aspect that clearly marks the adoption of open
education seems to suggest otherwise. FLOSS (Freesource as a winner is the fact that in this scenario,
Libre and Open Source Software) communities arethe developers are most often also the users of the
thriving well in learning environments too.software. This removes the perceived disconnect
The FLOSS model has been extensively used inbetween the developer community and the
initiatives like the MIT OpenCourseWare and Openend-users unlike in the case of proprietary
Source Biology. Project Gutenberg, the Wikipedia,applications. However, this is less evident in the case
The Open Dictionary project are prime examples ofof administrative applications like payroll or HR. In
how open source has been successfully adapted tosuch cases, adoption of open source has to be a
education initiatives.directed process.
In a community source project, multiple institutionsInitiatives like the Kuali project have proved that
come together to partner in the project. All partnersopen source can also build up sustainable models that
contribute financially as well as in employing humanprovide adequate support mechanisms. In such
resources for the effort. In the early stages, themodels, there is active collaboration between the
partnering institutions provide all design andcommunity that comprises not only developers and
development efforts and only in subsequent stages isend-users, but also an extended support group
the project opened to the broader community. Thiscomprising commercial vendors. These support
way, the initial support is secured and the institutionsgroups are available to offer timely support to
have a substantial influence in deciding how themission critical applications. The community approach
application is modeled and designed.also ensures that the code is not closed and that an
The initial focus of community source projects is onactive community of interest ensures that
collaboration between institutions. The focus in theenhancements keep happening as necessitated.
crucial first stages is therefore to form a commonProjects like uPortal have been developed with
economic outlook and an appropriate administrativeminimal resources but are deployed across hundreds
framework rather than forming a community aroundof institutions. The community approach has proved
a shared code. Most community based open sourcesustainable as in the case of the Sakai project. In
projects slowly migrate to open source in the laterterms of funding, the Sakai project garnered an
stages.investment of $6.8 million over two years.
The Sakai project, for example, started as a jointThe viability of the open source, community based
effort between four institutions (Michigan, Indiana,model stems not from the monetary or cost aspects
MIT and Stanford). The initial agenda was to set up abut principally the adaptability that it offers. The
framework of common goals that would producedebate over cost of ownership between
appropriate software based on an agreed list ofcommercially available proprietary software and open
objectives. The scope for participation was latersource applications is yet to be proved empirically.
increased by forming the Sakai Educational PartnersHowever, the fact that the code is open means it
Program (SEPP), whereby other institutions can joincan be easily adapted to suit new requirements and
and participate in the community for a small fee.does not involve significant investments in terms of
The Current Landscapecustomization or enhancements. This does make
An education enterprise like any organization has itssignificant economic sense in the longer term.
own needs ranging from resource planning toThe case for open source in higher education is nicely
budgeting. Additionally, they have typical requirementsdocumented in a study by the Alliance for Higher
like the need to integrate with financial aid programsEducation Competitiveness. In a 2005 study report
of the government, multiple payroll cycles, andtitled, 'Will Open Source Software Become an
student information systems (SIS) that handleImportant Institutional Strategy in Higher Education?'
admissions, grades, transcripts, student records asRob Abel notes how open source is a "great fit for
well as billing. All these call for robust ERP systems.higher education". The study, based on an analysis of
Until recently, colleges and universities mostly rely onopen source projects in education, opines that the
either custom-developed systems that are more thancommunity-based approach is an interesting model
15 years old, or have transitioned to commercialthat also helps reduce the inherent risks in adopting
products from vendors like Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoftan open source approach.
or vendors like SunGard that are geared towards theAs for the cost model, the study notes that while
higher education market.open source has helped generate cost savings in the
Kuali Financials was borne due to the lack of openrange of 20 to 30 percent for the commercial sector,
source solutions Enterprise applications in the higherthe same may not be entirely true in education. The
education sector are comprised of a mix of somecommunity-based approach, the writer notes, with its
proprietary application vendors and some key openassociated participation fees, may prove only
source community initiatives. PeopleSoft, Oracle,marginally beneficial in terms of costs. Institutions that
SunGard and Datatel are some key vendors thathave their own infrastructure and resources may
offer tightly integrated ERP packages for thehowever, benefit from substantially reduced costs
education sector.from their open source initiatives.
Recent consolidation in the industry, like theThe Future
acquisition of PeopleSoft by Oracle and of WebCT,Open source has proved to be adaptable and a
Angel, etc by Blackboard, has caused considerablereliable platform for collaboration and learning. In their
unease in the education fraternity. The concernquest for ideal application software to handle
stems from the fear that the trend of consolidationadministrative, operational and education platforms,
would lead to the monopoly of a few key vendors.most CIOs are looking at interoperability, reliability and
The plans of these vendors to offer tightlyscalability of applications. Applications like the Sakai
integrated systems heightens the fear that this willand Kuali have proved beyond doubt that open
provide an unfair leverage to these vendors as itsource applications offer great configurability.
would extend the community's dependence on them.Development communities and the support of
One area of concern about proprietary applications iscommercial vendors, as in the case of Kuali and Sakai,
a seeming disconnect between the industry andfuel a greater rate of innovation. Moreover, the
software application developers. Institutions also haveadvantage that is offered by collaboration also
strong reservations about the currently availableprovides an impetus to continued improvement of
administrative software and course managementthe system. Support systems and enhancements for
systems. The feeling is that applications provided byfuture requirements are ensured.
vendors such as SAP and PeopleSoft are adaptedOn the question of how to approach or adopt open
from other industries and does not work well forsource as a model, the answer would depend on the
educational enterprises. Moreover, the proprietaryneeds, the infrastructure and the means available to
nature of the applications implies that the sourcean institution. The community development model has
code is not available and customization efforts involveshown that costs can be broadly distributed amongst
substantial costs.participants. Experience shows that universities and
In the context of such a wide breadth ofcolleges can collaborate to produce open source
requirements, open source can prove to be a viablesoftware that caters to their needs in a way that is
alternative. In fact, these constraints provided thesuperior to some commercial products. The
impetus for open source initiatives in higher education.collaborative model enables educational institutions to
Some of the success has helped provide a strongpool their financial and technical resources. Moreover,
foundation to building an alternative support modela larger community ensures that the applications are
for the education industry.tested in a variety of testing environments, thus
In the Sakai project, the participating institutionsaiding in building robust solutions.
decided to integrate and synchronize their educationalIn term of core academics, learning systems will
software into a pre-integrated collection of openevolve to accommodate formative assessments and
source tools termed Collaborative Learningevaluation outside the classroom. Many higher
Environment (CLE). Sakai has active implementationseducation institutions have taken the lead of MIT and
running at multiple institutes including the University ofare offering online course materials that are
Michigan and Indiana University.accessible by anyone, free of cost. It has been
In parallel, Sakai also established a set of activityadopted at Yale, Notre Dame, Tufts and Stanford
based communities that have spawned an activeSchool of Engineering, to name a few. The United
cooperation between the industry and applicationNations has launched an initiative that would leverage
vendors. The Sakai Educational Partners Programsocial media technologies and ideas to offer higher
allows educational institutions to participate in theeducation opportunities to people who would
program for a small fee. Besides, there are the Sakaiotherwise not be able to afford the costs.
Commercial Affiliates, who offer fee-based servicesCommercially, open source projects have taken their
for installation, integration and support..first steps in the marketplace. The model is evolving
Kuali, on the other hand, mainly addresses aspects ofaided by some significant commercial vendor backing.
educational administration. The Kuali Financial SystemFor the community-based open source approach to
(KFS) is the most prominent application. It handlesprosper, substantial financial backing is an absolute
administrative and operational tasks like generalnecessity to prevent it from faltering and to avoid
accounting, purchasing, salary and benefits, budgeting,the pitfalls that arise form source code being easily
asset management and grants. The system ismodifiable and rebranded by a different vendor. From
designed around modules that enable it to bethe commercial perspective, projects like Sakai and
tweaked to work with existing commercialthe Kuali Foundation are likely to thrive as they have
applications. For example, at Indiana University, Kualisubstantial stakeholders from both the academic and
applications work together with PeopleSoft's HR andthe corporate world.
student system. The Kuali Foundation is a non-profitWhat could derail further adoption? There are several
consortium of multiple universities and somepotential risk areas:
hardware and software companies. The Kuali- Lack of understanding of entry points for adoption
Commercial Affiliate program operates on similar lines- Lack of support to adopt the applications
like its Sakai counterpart. The community has been- Minimal staff to support the applications
growing and now includes the University of California,- Lack of training / documentation to train staff
Cornell, Michigan State University, San Joaquin Delta- A "runaway" project that consumes much press
College (Calif.), and The University of Arizona.and develops a negative bias toward the project
Significantly, according to the 2008 CampusMany of these risks may be mitigated though
Computing Survey, around 13.8 percent of theco-operative initiatives between the foundations
survey participants have already identified an Opendeveloping the open source solutions and commercial
Source LMS - either Moodle or Sakai - as the campusaffiliates looking to support the solutions - and
standard LMS.develop complementation solutions. Some examples:
Besides these, several other projects offer SIS- Further publicity through conventional, non-education
functionality. For example, openSIS manages studentrelated channels such as Google and industry-based
demographics, scheduling, attendance, grades,sites such as edu1world
transcripts, and health records, and its parent- Furrther innovation and cooperation - whether
company makes add-on modules to support additionalthrough 'summer of code' collaborations; or
features like disciplinary tracking, billing, food service,community collaborations that will transform the
and bulk email/SMS messaging for emergencycurrent listservs to more accessible forums
contact.- Commercial affiliates offering training and webinars
Other Key intiaitives are- Commercial affiliates offering ease of use entry
JaSig community developing uPortal, and CAS (Centralpoints, such as pre-installed servers or virtual images
Authentication Services) two components serving asthat can be downloaded and used out of the box
input to Kuali Rice.In conclusion, open source initiatives in higher
Internet2 - A consortium led by universities workingeducation have a long way to go before they enter
in partnership with industry and government tothe commercial mainstream in a significant fashion.
develop and deploy advanced network applicationsHowever, with industry and academic collaboration, it
and technologies including products such as Shibbolethhas a great potential to change the higher education
and Grouperlandscape in the longer term.
Open Source Curricula