Rhetoric - The Great Hoax

On the Internet, when you search for deceptivebeyond identifying the very basic parts, pieces, and
rhetoric or rhetoric hoax, you'll get more than twopatterns of Rhetoric?
million hits for either one. That volume of hits is anPlainly, this encyclopedia is not claiming to be
echo of what we've heard all our lives---that Rhetoricthorough and comprehensive, claiming that it covers
is associated with deception and trickery, evenonly the basics, "an introduction." After 2,500 years
though the college experts try to reassure us thatof discussions and arguments about what Rhetoric is
the discipline of Rhetoric is really neutral. Fact is,and what it is not, surely there should be more than
though, most of what the public knows aboutjust "an introduction" to Rhetoric in an encyclopedia
Rhetoric is a hoax, especially as regards the origins,dedicated to it!
the history, and the confusion over Rhetoric inIs a more comprehensive version, which goes
academic circles.beyond this "introduction," in the works or being
The Origins of Rhetoricplanned? No mention of that.
Most people, even school teachers, think the historyFurthermore, "Rhetoric... is becoming ever more
of Rhetoric began in Greece with Aristotle-------but itdifficult to locate in a conceptual framework...."
didn't.What?!!! There's that "paradox" sort of difficulty,
In 427 A.D., sixty-year-old Gorgias, a sophist fromagain, as confessed by the first encyclopedia we
the Greek colony of Leontini, in Sicily, broughtdiscussed.
Rhetoric to Athens. He settled in Athens andMaybe it would have been helpful to explain what
popularized rhetoric by offering public demonstrations"conceptual framework" means. Perhaps it has
of his skill in public speaking, which was his way ofsomething to do with identifying an overall pattern
marketing his trade to anyone who wanted to learnthat organizes all the concepts of Rhetoric---"ever
to speak as he did.more difficult to locate," even now?
One of his most apt students, Isocrates, learned theThe fact that "many theorists are reconceptualizing
trade and became "the most influential teacher ofRhetoric "in its own terms" clearly implies that
rhetoric in Aristotle's time" (On Rhetoric, Kennedy,theorists have not been conceptualizing Rhetoric in its
George A., New York: Oxford University Press, 2006,own terms, for some reason. Why might that be?
p. 13).Let me take a shot at it---Perhaps it is because
Why wasn't Aristotle "the most influential teacher ofRhetoric has so very many disorganized parts and
rhetoric" in his own time?pieces, without a clear hierarchical pattern of
Because he had his own personal brand of Rhetoric,connections, that it's literally impossible to pin it all
and he taught it only to students in his small, privatedown into an organized pattern. In short, "rhetoric
school in Athens, called the Lyceum. And his Rhetoric,can mean nearly anything" (Professor George Pullman
really more of a collection of notes gathered overof Georgia State University; conference, What is the
the years than anything else, was not published in hisNew Rhetoric? in Sydney, Australia, 2005) that an
lifetime (384-322 B.C.) and was basically unknown'expert' wants it to be and says it is. Given what I've
outside his small, private school.shown, here, that seems a decent interpretation of
In fact, not only was Aristotle's Rhetoric unknown inwhat was said in the prefaces to those two
his own time, it was largely unknown and untaughtencyclopedias.
throughout the ages. According to George A.So Rhetoric is definitely fair game for being
Kennedy---a universally praised scholar of ancientcompared to the saying, "You can't see the forest
Greek culture and a highly esteemed translator offor the trees." Rhetoric has so many hundreds of
Aristotle's Rhetoric---Aristotle's Rhetoric wasdevices and isolated concepts ("trees"), yet it has no
"obsolete as a school text" throughout most ofclear, overriding principle ("forest") to hold them all
history (On Rhetoric, p. 308).together in a plainly recognizable pattern.
The History of RhetoricWay back in 1663, the poet and satirist Samuel Butler
Aristotle's Rhetoric became obsolete because, first ofsaid what many had said for centuries in more
all, it was lost in Asia Minor for about 200 years aftergeneral ways and captured the spirit of this perennial
his death in 322 B.C.-------out of circulation, out ofconfusion and uncertainty about Rhetoric with his
usage, out of sight, out of mind.famous, oft-quoted criticism:
During that time, probably because it had no realFor all a rhetorician's rules teach nothing but to name
competition, the Rhetoric of Isocrates flourished andhis tools.
became established as the major well-spring forCute little saying, but Samuel Butler was serious. And
progress in the art of Rhetoric.so was Herbert Spencer (a very influential English
Also during that lost time, three very popular majorphilosopher of the Nineteenth Century, in Europe and
features were added to Isocrates's Rhetoric thatAmerica, in both literature and Rhetoric) when he said
were never developed in Aristotle's version:in his 1852 essay, "The Philosophy of Style,"
· stasisThe maxims contained in works on composition and
(contributed to Rhetoric by Hermagoras of Temnosrhetoric are presented in an unorganized form.
around 150 B.C.; a systematic series of questionsStanding as isolated dogmas---as empirical
used to develop the central issue in court cases)generalizations, they are neither so clearly
· tropesapprehended, nor so much respected, as they would
(one of two major divisions in figures of speech, seebe were they deduced from some simple first
below; using words in a way that their normalprinciple.
meaning is replaced with something else, such as,My take on what Spencer was saying is this:
"today the White House issued a statement"---as weThe many rules for writing and public speaking are
know, the White House building did not issue thenot organized. If they were organized under a single,
statement; irony is another example, such as when asimple, powerfully unifying principle, then the rules of
sarcastic students says, "Yeah, I just loooovecomposition and rhetoric could be clearly understood,
grammar")taught, and learned.
· figures of speechA much more modern Rhetoric authority, the late
(the Stoic philosophers of Athens added these toProfessor Wayne C. Booth of the University of
Rhetoric somewhere between 250 and 100 B.C.;Chicago, plainly agreed but went a little further than
figures of speech are divided into two mainSpencer when he said,
categories: schemes and tropes; schemes change theWhere is the theory, where are the practical rules
ordinary or expected pattern of words, such as, "Myfor ensuring that this talk will not only grab you, as
voice teacher, a real looker," which uses the schemethe Madison Avenue rhetoricians say, but keep you
of apposition or renaming; and tropes change thegrabbed and send you away determined to behave
general meaning of words, as discussed in the entrydifferently? (The Essential Wayne Booth, Wayne C.
just above).Booth & Walter Jost, University of Chicago Press:
Scholars throughout history considered these three2007, p. 69)
Rhetorical features as extremely important andBooth's point was that modern writing texts don't
studied and discussed them extensively. So they paidprovide a comprehensive theory or practical rules for
little attention to Aristotle's Rhetoric, which did notwriting or speaking to a specific audience (neither did
have them, after it was found and 'published' aroundAristotle's), and that Aristotle's Rhetoric couldn't fulfill
80 B.C. Then, around 190 A.D., Alexander ofour modern needs for "a rhetoric of the symposium,
Aphrodesias published a commentary on Aristotle'sof the conference room," or of other modern
Rhetoric, and scholarly interest revived a bit.situations that were not even imaginable in ancient
However, throughout the Middle Ages and theGreece.
Renaissance, the principal texts on Rhetoric were notFurthermore, there's been a whole host of Rhetoric
Aristotle's, but two books that were based largely onauthorities over the last one hundred and fifty years
the Rhetoric of Isocrates and its accompanying threewho have been simply clamoring for a "New
supplementary features discussed above. These twoRhetoric"---because, like Booth, Spencer, and Butler,
books were Rhetorica ad Herrenium (Rhetoric forthey see that Rhetoric simply can't handle the
Herrenium), of unknown authorship, and Dediversity, depth, breadth, and uniqueness of modern
Inventione (On Invention), written by Cicero (106-43times. These authorities include a number of
B.C.), the great Roman philosopher, politician, andacademic heavyweights: I. A. Richards, Kenneth
rhetorician.Burke, Wayne C. Booth, W. R. Winterowd, Francis
The modern academic and philosophic interest inChristensen, James L. Kinneavy, E. D. Hirsch Jr.,
Aristotle's approach to Rhetoric is often traced toAndrea Lunsford, Lisa Ede, Richard Lanham, Reed
the publication of philosopher Kenneth Burke's book,Way Dasenbrock, C. H. Knoblauch, and Lil Brannon.
A Rhetoric of Motives, which was published in 1950.So confusion reigns among modern encyclopedias
Since then, many other books have investigated anddedicated to Rhetoric, and academic authorities have
expounded upon Aristotle's Rhetoric, and morebeen complaining about the failings of Rhetoric for
people today are reading and studying it than did sohundreds, if not thousands, of years. And they are all
in all the rest of history combined.clamoring for something new-------because the old
So the public perception that Aristotle's Rhetoric isRhetoric just isn't good enough anymore.
the Rhetoric that was handed down and taughtConclusion
widely in schools throughout the ages is quite wrong.Add to all that, the 2002 report from the National
This hoax has been perpetuated by well-meaning butEducation Association that only one in five high school
poorly educated textbook writers.seniors can write well enough to do college work. No
The Confusion Over Rhetoric in Academic Circleswonder the National Commission on Writing (NCW)
Now, wouldn't you think that the actual bedrockdeclared in 2003 that there's a crisis in teaching
principles of Rhetoric, the fundamental principles,writing in America! But what did the NCW
would be pretty well-known and established afterrecommend?
2,500 years?The NCW practically demanded more time, more
And you would also think that an encyclopediapeople, and more money be poured into the same
dedicated to collecting and explaining all the importantold, ineffective writing instruction, without any basic
parts, patterns, processes, purposes, andchanges to the fundamental principles that determine
perspectives of Rhetoric would clearly identify andhow writing is taught! (And, of course, what is taught
discuss them, right?in writing textbooks and writing classes across
Well, take a look at what the Preface says in theAmerica is all based on Rhetoric. Rhetoricians are
Encyclopedia of Rhetoric (New York: Oxford Press,proud to point this out, by the way.) They want to
2001):spend a whole lot more money, time, and people on
... [this is] our effort to abstract rhetoric as far as wethe same old thing that isn't working? As they say on
could... and to endeavor to search for its principles.Sesame Street, "What's wrong with this picture?"
"Search for its principles"? Immediately following thatOne last very telling point---Is there a final test that
eye-opener is this:would either prove or disqualify Rhetoric as the basis
We recognize the paradox, in view of what we takefor teaching writing?
rhetoric to be. It is nearly impossible either toYes, there is. It's called the What if test, and here it
abstract a temporal cause from its effects or to lookis:
anew at a subject anchored in but not confined to anWhat if an essay or some other written work has all
ancient tradition. But the attempt to do so, wethe pertinent forms of Rhetoric used perfectly in it?
believe, sets this work apart from other recentAnd what if it isn't new to the readers?
publications such as the Encyclopedia of Rhetoric andIf the reading audience DOES already know the ideas
Composition.... [my bolding]and is familiar with the presentation, then what's the
I'm not even going to attempt to work out thepoint of that writing? Without being new, it has no
"paradox" reasoning.audience. At the very least, it will be oppressively
But I wonder: Am I reading too much into this? Isboring to readers.
Rhetoric as hard to define, is it as unstable and asIf it's a book intended for public distribution, it won't
unclear in what its old principles are and in what itssee the light of publishing day---people don't put out
new principles are, as this encyclopedia makes out?good money for old news, and publishers know that
Let's try another encyclopedia dedicated tovery well. Ditto for poetry, short stories, essays, and
Rhetoric---there's only one other. Looking at theespecially journalistic articles, opinions, and editorials.
Preface to the Encyclopedia of Rhetoric andAnd the Rhetoric of Isocrates, the Rhetoric of
Composition (New York: Garland, 1996), we find:Aristotle, the Rhetoric of Cicero, the Rhetoric of
... [this encyclopedia] provides an introduction toQuintilian, the Rhetorica ad Herennium, James L.
rhetoric, including the major periods and personages,Kinneavy's Theory of Discourse---not one of them
concepts and applications. Rhetoric... is becoming everdevelops a step-by-step process for generating the
more difficult to locate in a conceptual framework...astonishingly simple but amazing ignored concept
many theorists are reconceptualizing rhetoric in itsof-------
own terms. [my bolding]What's new to the reader
This encyclopedia of rhetoric "provides an introductionWe don't need a New Rhetoric.
to Rhetoric"? Only an introduction? It doesn't goWe need a Rhetoric of Newness.