So You Want to Improve Education???

first of all, be stone-cold realistic about this project.prevent children from mastering even the simplest
The Education Establishment, that is, the people inarithmetic. (It’s helpful here to note that
charge, don’t give a darn what you want.private schools and the homeschooling community
They have been dumbing down the schools of thetend to reject New New Math.)
US for almost 100 years, relentlessly, ruthlessly. TheyReform Five: kids should learn facts. The Education
won’t look kindly on your efforts to improveEstablishment has for many decades waged war
education. They will think you presumptuous andagainst memorization. “They can look it
insubordinate. They are in charge of education, youup” is the cry of this anti-intellectual cartel. No.
are not, and that’s that. So you should“They” won’t need to look it
anticipate that they will mislead you, obstruct you,up because “they” will know it.
song-and-dance you, and in general treat you like theStarting in the first grade, children should learn the
silly, irrelevant person they know you to be.simplest facts (the names of the oceans and
Still want to improve education? Okay, let’scontinents, for example). They learn foundational
get started:information; they build on this; and then they build
Reform One: the single most important change weanother layer on the first layer. As the years go by,
need is that teachers must major/minor in thethey become what used to be called educated. And
subjects they will teach. They absolutely must notthey like it that way -- because facts are fun, and
major in Education. They must, throughout theirknowledge is power.
teaching careers, be Experts in the subjects they areReform Six: root out all the phony methods
teaching. Only in America can someone major inintroduced by the Education Establishment during the
Education and end up teaching Chemistry. It’s20th century. Vast energy was spent devising and
so ridiculous you can deduce immediately that thepromoting sophistries whose actual impact was
people who made this possible were not seriousnegative. There are DOZENS of these clunkers, each
about education.one more destructive than the next. Self Esteem said
Reform Two: the second most important reform weyou had to praise children even when they had the
need is that states which now require teachers towrong answer. Constructivism said children had to
join the NEA (a highly politicized union) must changecreate their own knowledge, an absurd project
that law. If teachers want to join a union,requiring many extra years. Multiculturalism said that
that’s their business. Coercing them to joinknowledge about faraway places was just as
sounds a lot like an un-American abuse of power.important as knowledge about a young
Let’s take the politics out of education,student’s own city or country...The point is
especially the far-left ideology that has always beenthat all these sophistries are destructive. They are a
more concerned with social engineering than withkind of mental crabgrass growing everywhere in the
genuine education.public schools. So the first order of business is to
Reform Three: fix reading instruction. Reading is theclear away the weeds.
single most essential skill; education can’tAll right, suppose we have achieved these six
really begin until reading is learned. Phonics proponentsreforms. What would the resulting schools look like?
have always said they would teach virtually all childrenLike almost all the best schools have looked for
to read by the end of first grade. On the other hand,many thousands of years. But less severe perhaps,
proponents of Whole Word, Sight Words, Dolchmore ingenious in the use of teaching aids (thanks to
Words, and all non-phonetic approaches have neverthe digital age, we have so many more of them
claimed that they would teach children to read morenow).
than a few hundred words per year. This is whatPoint is, the old-fashioned schools worked very well.
lawyers call prima facie malfeasance. The victims ofOrdinary kids learned the basic information they
this wrong-headed approach turn out, in largeneeded to be citizens, to read the daily paper, and to
percent, to be functionally illiterate, dyslexic, or ableadvance further academically if they chose. So much
to read only with great difficulty.of the claptrap introduced in the public schools the
Reform Four: the next most important skill ispast century never had anything to do with
arithmetic, which should be taught in a smootheducation, only with social engineering. All these
progression from the simplest bits to the moreill-advised additions have warped our judgment of
advanced aspects. Reform Math programs (a/k/awhat a school should look like and, indeed, all that a
New New Math) should be eliminated from theschool can hope to accomplish. What we need to do
schools because they muddle the basics, mix inis to recover the best of the past, blended with the
advanced concepts with simple concepts, andbest of the new possibilities.