Teaching and Learning Modern Foreign Languages in the United Kingdom - Conclusion

IV. 4 Limited choicesGovernment. Another evolution is that the plethora
Since September 2004, Modern Foreign Languagesof traditional resources meets new competition from
are an entitlement, which means, as explained earlier,the rapidly improving 21st century technology.
that schools must offer pupils the opportunity toInformation and communication technology, and
study one language up to GCSE. However, in practiceinteractive whiteboards, are now a common feature
schools deal with this new governmental policy veryin classrooms.
differently from each other. Head Teachers ofAlthough the future of language teaching should look
Comprehensive Schools have the possibility topositive with all these developments, there are still
implement the decision in varied ways, and forsome detractors, but also some deeply rooted beliefs
instance in Specialist Languages School the tuition ofwhich are detrimental to the progress of this school
Modern Foreign Languages at Key Stage 4 is stillsubject. In the United Kingdom, people still do not
compulsory. In School Z, where the number offeel a sense of belonging to continental Europe as far
options offered is limited, pupils who opt for textilesas traditions, culture and languages are concerned. "In
have to take a language. There are timetableevery other school subject, the model of
constraints, which makes any other combinationperformance is one who has followed the same
impossible. Pupils are therefore often resentful, aslearning route that both pupil and teacher must take.
they feel that what should have been a choice hasIn our subject, the model is the well educated native
been imposed on them.speaker, whose mastery neither the learner, nor
Some other Head Teachers promote the learning ofmost teachers, however gifted, can hope to equal."
a language and ensure that it is valued in the school(Hawkins, 1996: 16). Modern Foreign Languages
and community, and so they manage to keep theremains a highly academic subject and the
number of candidates who decide to enter for agovernmental decision to make it an optional
languages GCSE quite high. This is often the case inentitlement leads many students to drop this subject
middle class catchment areas where the benefits ofwhich is both challenging and demanding. Schools in
learning a language are understood and supported bydeprived catchment areas are not encouraging
families.students to pursue the learning of this subject and
The schools that have suffered the most from thissome Key Stage 3 students are already showing
decision are Comprehensive Schools in more deprivedsigns of disaffection. School budgets vary
areas, where there is no understanding of thetremendously according to the way Local Education
resource that languages can be, especially to improveAuthorities allocate their funds, and if schools do not
Literacy skills. Some schools even withdraw pupilsbenefit from additional grants it is increasingly difficult
who have Special Educational Needs from Languagesto provide up-to-date resources.
lessons, in order to provide them with extra supportAlthough the quality of published material has vastly
in English. In school Z, the Literacy Co-ordinatorimproved, the statutory inclusion policy that the
agrees on the importance of offering children theGovernment expects from schools requires a greater
possibility to gain from learning a language, and he hasneed for differentiation. Schools can hardly afford
advised the Special Educational Needs co-ordinator tobuying sets of textbooks to suit the needs of every
avoid removing them from lessons.individual student. Modern Foreign Languages are
Pupils acquire transferable skills in Modern Foreignoften a department that performs badly at national
Languages, and this should be explained moreexamination levels, such as the General Certificate of
thoroughly to the general public.Secondary Education or the A Levels. Achievement is
Schools often aim to raise achievement in terms ofone of the most common decisive factors used by
numbers, and in this concern the actual learningschools management to allocate funding. Therefore
process is not taken into account. Modern Foreigneven if new technological devices are available, many
Languages teachers sometimes have to face poorModern Foreign Languages departments can not get
behaviour in lessons, due to the perception of theequipped with them because it is not within their
subject. This is in direct link with the impossibility tobudget. On the other hand, some colleagues who
practice speaking and listening skills in some contexts,benefit from instruments such as interactive
which implies that pupils will perform badly when theywhiteboards are not trained appropriately and do not
are assessed. Pupils are set according to ability inuse them to their full potential. The educational value
most schools, and the group which is labelled 'bottomand actual effectiveness of these new resources are
set' is usually a mixture of low achievers and badlyyet to be proven, once the novelty factor has
behaved pupils. However, this has also a negativesubsided.
impact on pupils' self esteem. Very low predictedTeaching and Learning is the latest governmental
grades have a negative effect on their motivation.focus in its effort to improve national examination
Some Languages Schools, but some Comprehensiveresults. The latter is many schools' obsession as it
Schools as well, have decided to disregard thedetermines their rank in the League Table, which is
languages entitlement at Key Stage 4 by creatingthe way schools are judged by the general public.
fast track sections in which pupils take their GCSESome schools strongly guide their students in their
exams at the end of Year 9. In Year 7, pupils are setoption choice to obtain better overall results. Some
by Christmas and the lessons of the fast trackother schools think about alternative strategies to
groups are immediately tailored to progress at aenforce the government requirements but also
quicker pace. Other pupils are in mixed ability sets.develop their students' languages skills, such as the
Pupils who sit their exams at the end of Key Stage 3creation of 'fast track groups', so that students can
are also learning a second language, which follows thetake their General Certificate of Secondary Education
mainstream teaching routine, and they are eventuallyin Modern Foreign Languages at the end of Key
assessed at the end of Year 11.Stage 3, when it is still a core subject.
The policies that the Government is implementing forThe paradoxical political position of the United
the 14 to 16 education in Languages also appear toKingdom in educational affairs reflects to some
be in contradiction with some development plans forextent the country's public opinion about language
the 16 to 19 provision. The future of the system oflearning. According to surveys, the British population
assessment has been discussed lately by politiciansappears to regret their lack of proficiency in Modern
and educators. Some suggest the introduction of aForeign Languages but do not transmit this to the
baccalaureate system which should be based on theyounger generation, who is in a position to acquire
existing International Baccalaureate. This would implylanguages skills at school. Although the decision to
the necessity of learning a language in the post 16introduce Modern Foreign Languages at primary
education. Although this seems to be the directionschool level as a core subject in the curriculum can
favoured by many educators, Governmental plansonly be praised, its actual implementation is yet to be
appear to be different and somehow ambiguous.achieved appropriately. Primary school teachers who
The English baccalaureate which is a suggested routeare not specialists in Modern Foreign Languages might
seems to be strongly following the lines of theresent teaching the subject, even if they are
current A Level system. As far as Modern Foreignprovided with suitable training. The shortage of
Languages are concerned, Recommendation 14linguists at higher level, that is to say studying A
included in the "14-19 reform: Inclusiveness, challenge,Level courses and/or attending University, will
quality and choice", published by the Dfes in 2004,generate in turn professionals with no skills at all in
states that "the Government should ensure athis area, including primary schools teachers.
comprehensive and flexible Modern Foreign LanguageThe recent focus that the Government makes on
offer, building upon the National Languages Strategyvocational training does not involve Modern Foreign
(...) The existing entitlement to study a ModernLanguages. On the contrary, it has led to their
Foreign Language at Key Stage 4 should bedisappearance as a foundation subject in the
extended to 16-19 year olds."curriculum at Key Stage 4. Ruth Kelly, the Secretary
The United Kingdom is aware of the need to raiseof State for Education, made the following statement
the profile of Modern Foreign Languages. Theto the House of Commons on the 14-19 White Paper
necessity to teach pupils languages so that theyon 23 February 2005: "Historically, our education
become proficient users is recognised by thesystem has produced a high achieving elite while
Government. Several business groups havefailing the majority. In today's global economy, in
expressed their concern in the last ten years aboutwhich our national competitiveness increasingly
the lack of skilled employees. Although it is commondepends on the skills of each an every person, we
knowledge, as many studies and enquiries havecannot afford so much talent to go to waste."
researched this matter, none of the current orHowever, Modern Foreign Languages as an optional
forthcoming educational policies appear to have thefeature in the curriculum creates a divide in
potential to change durably the present situation.opportunities according to social class. Figures show
"Britain is Europe's foreign languages dunce: only onethat in deprived areas the disaffection and the
in three Britons can speak a second language (...) Therejection of Modern Foreign Languages at Key Stage
inquiry into exam reform by the former chief schools4, and to some extent at Key Stage 3, have already
inspector, Mike Tomlinson, suggested a foreignreached high percentages. Other measures, such as
language should become a compulsory part of a newthe reintroduction of assessments at the end of
style vocational qualification such as Leisure andprimary school, will lead to even more segregation in
Tourism" (The Independent, 24/12/2004: 6). Thethe access to education. Schools which are in the top
Government strongly focuses on developingplaces in the League Tables are the ones many
vocational studies and might integrate moreparents want to send their children to. Some are
specialised languages skills within the curriculum.even prepared to move to live in the catchment area
However, the current Programme of Study for Keyof specific schools to offer the best opportunities to
Stage 3 already focuses on the necessity to providetheir children. The price of housing is dependent upon
pupils with a range of appropriate transferable skills.many criteria amongst which the proximity of a
The content of the curriculum, though, would benefitsought after school is a prominent one.
from covering a wider range of needs.Besides, restricting access to some schools by
CONCLUSIONselecting on aptitude is against the principle of
Traditionally the educational system of the Unitedcomprehensive schools. The plan to turn all schools
Kingdom conveyed first and foremost the nationalinto Comprehensive Schools was never achieved, and
language, values and traditions throughout itsthe political direction taken by the current Labour
curriculum. Modern Foreign Languages were not aGovernment turns away even more from this plan.
priority.Tony Blair announced a focus on developing schools
The birth of Comprehensive Schools could havewith a 'specialist status' in 2000. Schools bidding for
brought some progress. The selecting process tothis status need to raise £50,000 in business
enter Secondary School known as the 'eleven plussponsorship, set improvement targets for the school
exam' was suppressed and schools were opened toand involve the local community. If successful, schools
every individual, regardless of class, gender orobtain £100,000 in capital grants and an
ethnicity. Languages teaching had to be adapted toadditional £120 per pupil a year for four years.
fit the new generation classrooms as the lessonsThey are also allowed to select up to 10 per cent of
were no longer attended by the elite of students.their new applicants. The Government seems to
The process was not without difficulties and theencourage selection and elitism and Modern Foreign
exam results were not encouraging.Languages are highly affected by this ethos.
To try to improve matters, Modern ForeignThe scale of this research is limited and some
Languages became compulsory at nationalimplications may not have been analysed. Although
examination level in 1986. At the same time, businessthe elitist approach of the Government is detrimental
professionals and associations promoting languages,to Modern Foreign Languages as far as secondary
such as the Centre for Information on Languageschools are concerned, the introduction of languages
Teaching, noticed a shortage of people able to useat primary school level can generate hope as to a
languages in professional contexts. To research intopotential for language skills to be developed in the
the reasons for this, the Nuffield Foundation startedUnited Kingdom. One might put forward the possibility
an inquiry whose final results were published in 2000.of outreach work that colleagues from specialist
The Government was held partly responsible for theschools can offer to their primary school
absence of coherent policies to promote languagescounterparts. This would improve the quality of the
within the United Kingdom.delivery of teaching and the learning outcomes.
The Nuffield Final Report suggested some measuresBesides, the number of students on roll in languages
which could help to develop the interest andat secondary school level decreases, which implies
knowledge in Modern Foreign Languages. Mostthat some Comprehensive School teachers will
government policies then followed thebecome available to teach full time in one primary
recommendations of the Nuffield Foundation. Aschool or in a consortium of primary schools.
National Curriculum was created in 1999. A newIn the perspective that human resources are dealt
Strategy for teaching Modern Foreign Languages atwith adequately, the transition between primary and
Key Stage 3 was elaborated in 2003, alongside asecondary level will have to be addressed. So far,
Framework for teaching languages. The introductionstudents who start Year 7 are taught the rudiments
of Modern Foreign Languages as a foundation subjectof a Modern Foreign Language during their first year
within the curriculum in primary schools should beof instruction. The content of the curriculum needs to
implemented by 2012. All these measures aim atbe altered rapidly to fit the level of ability students
enforcing the position of languages within thewill have reached at the beginning of Year 7. As
curriculum, as a subject that provides transferablepupils come from various 'feeder' primary schools, the
skills and which is a valuable asset to thedifference in level of achievement will have to be
development of pupils' literacy skills. However,dealt with. Teaching and learning Modern Foreign
alongside all these constructive improvements, theLanguages at primary school has a huge potential in
Government decided to change the status of Modernso far that 'fast tracking courses' could become a
Foreign Languages by removing them from the corestandard practice, and most students could take their
curriculum at Key Stage 4. Schools are requiredGeneral Certificate of Secondary Education in Modern
though to offer the option, as any student is entitledForeign Languages at the end of Year 9.
to benefit from tuition in a foreign language.Achievement is self perpetuating; pupils who
The innovations in the educational system betweenexperience success in the early stages of their
the 1960s and the present mean that the teachinglearning may well be motivated by this and continue
and learning of Modern Foreign Languages have hadto succeed on into Key Stage 4.
to face many changes too. The resources availableThe development of vocational strands could also be
to teach the subject were not suitable after theinterrelated with Modern Foreign Languages. Current
schools transferred to comprehensive schools, and soGeneral Vocational National Qualifications (GNVQ)
the resources had to be adapted. Changes in thewhich are an alternative post 16 route in specialities
examination process with the introduction of thesuch as Leisure and Tourism, Media or Business
General Certificate of Secondary Education in 1988Studies, do not include a module in Modern Foreign
also led to necessary adaptations. Publishers had toLanguages. To encourage students to pursue
provide resources that fitted the new standardisedlanguages at Key Stage 4, a vocational course in
curriculum, as Local Education Authorities lost theirModern Foreign Languages designed to lead on this
control in that matter in favour of the centralspeciality could be developed.