Teaching and Learning Modern Foreign Languages in the United Kingdom Part 1

I.1. Modern Foreign Languages within the curriculum:Foreign Languages that could be of actual use, and
1900 - 1988that a second language should be offered in Year 8
I.1.a. A curriculum?or in Year 9 to the students who would gain from it.
Between the1880s and 1904, many pupils had theNevertheless, one year later another report showed
opportunity of learning a Modern Foreign Language.signs of very low achievement in Modern Foreign
The main language taught was French; however,Languages. That year, 59,860 boys sat the
German was also taught occasionally. This was theCertificate of Secondary Education, and 17.63%
case in most schools existing at the time, althoughgained a pass grade; 103,466 girls sat the same
schooling was less compulsory, with compulsoryexam and 22.63% passed. The results were better
education targeting only a range of students from sixthough for the students who sat a General
to twelve.Certificate Ordinary Level. Among the 58,962 boys
In 1904, the Board of Education suppressed Modernwho took the exam, 58.87% of them got an A to C
Foreign Languages from the curriculum. This lastedgrade. As for the 88,695 girls who did the same
for almost 60 years. This had an impact onexam, 60.47% obtained A to C, which was the pass
generations of British pupils, in so far that languagesgrade for this specific exam.
did not appear to be important; and therefore, forDespite all the reports previously mentioned, the
years, the British have argued that they were noConsultative Document about the Curriculum for
good at learning them.students aged 11 to 16 delivered in 1987
The 1944 Education Act was a turning point for therecommended to include a Modern Foreign Language
United Kingdom's educational system. It made schoolwithin the foundation subjects. This means that a
compulsory between the ages of 5 and 15. Thelanguage would become compulsory for all the
Ministry of Education, which had become thestudents for five years. It also implied that they
Department for Education and Science, introducedwould have to sit a formal examination after the
the "tripartite system". Secondary schools werefive-year course.
converted into 'Grammar schools' for the most ableIn 1988, a long awaited reform of the examination
students, the senior schools turned into 'Secondarysystem took place. In 1978, the Waddell Report
Modern Schools' and had the majority of thealready recommended a single exam at age 16 to
students on their roll, and 'Secondary Technicalreplace the General Certificate of Education and the
Schools' for those with a technical/scientific aptitudeCertificate of Secondary Education.
were created. The age at which the transitionThe Certificate of Secondary Education introduced in
between primary and secondary schools was to be1965, which was designed for those students who
made became more definite in the 1980s, when thewere not able to achieve the traditional O level, was
different age groups were divided into five Keyeventually replaced by the General Certificate of
Stages. Students had to start secondary school atSecondary Education, with the 1988 Education
the end of Key Stage 2.Reform Act being published. This new exam, which
In 1944, the Local Education Authorities provided thewas launched across the subjects, put an emphasis
facilities and equipment for schools. They alsoon assessing the four skills of listening, writing,
acquired the resources needed and paid teachers.reading and speaking. This was seen as one of the
They were to make sure that there was enoughbiggest achievements within the Modern Foreign
space to accommodate all the students between theLanguages field in many years. Keith Joseph was the
age of 5 and 15 within the catchment area. They alsothen Secretary of State for Education. His decision to
determined the length of the school day. They hadinitiate a new General Certificate of Secondary
an overview of the curriculum, but no control as such.Education was aimed at preventing Local Education
Over time, the way Local Education AuthoritiesAuthorities from interfering with assessments. So far,
administered their area was very different and thethe curriculum had been in their hands and often
emphasis placed on certain types of school had afulfilled the requirements of some specific universities.
tremendous impact on the wider community.It did not necessarily follow a logical and progressive
The Secretary of State did not have the legal rightcontent.
to determine the contents of the curriculum. TheTesting and assessments were to become a regular
Department for Education and Sciences' requests, asprocedure that students of future generations would
far as the curriculum was concerned, were extremelyhave to sit at the ages of 7, 11, 14 and 16. Students'
limited except for Religious Studies (daily worship andindividual results would not be available to everybody,
religious education became statutory). The subjectsbut the school overall results would be made available.
taught, and the methods and contents, were left toThis was the birth of the League tables, dreaded by
the teaching profession and head teachers. This wasmany British Schools. League tables are nowadays
the case until the 1980s, though Her Majesty'spublished in newspapers and analysed on television.
Inspectorate and the Office for Standards inThis influences parents in the wishes they express
Education were inspecting and reporting aboutfor their children to be enrolled in one school rather
schools. No major change happened until 1988.than another.
Therefore between 1904 and 1964, the teaching ofThe 1988 Education Reform Act's main innovation
languages as we perceive it in 2005 was very limited,was to establish for the first time a prescribed
in the few schools that offered this option. Thesenational curriculum for all state schools for the
were mainly grammar schools or public schools.students from the age of five upwards. Within this
Indeed, often students were taught only Greek orcurriculum, it was decided that languages would figure
Latin. Where Modern Foreign Languages were madeas a foundation subject in secondary schools,
available, the main skills developed were reading andalthough informally many comprehensive schools,
writing. The emphasis was on grammar, literacy andwhich before this Act had the freedom to decide
the communicative aspects of languages werewhether they wanted their students to pursue a
completely overlooked. The emphasis was placed onlanguage up to the age of 16 or not, had already
developing intellectual skills, and the teaching methodsmade them statutory.
were the ones employed for classical languages.In 1996, the Education Act reinforced all the previous
Modern Foreign Languages were not seen as aActs from the famous Butler Education act of 1944
means to an end; the ability to communicate with aonwards, but in the languages field it mainly
native speaker of the target language seemed to bereasserted the fact that Modern Foreign Languages
of very little importance. The purpose of learning awas a foundation subject and that all students in
language was to elevate yourself to higher academicYear 10 had to take their French, German or Spanish
standards and to be part of an elite.GCSE. Schools had to obey the law.
I.1.b 1960s-1970s: ambiguous positionsI.3. The Nuffield Inquiry
Until 1965, universities in the United Kingdom requiredThe Nuffield Foundation is a charitable trust which
prospective students to have a basic knowledge of awas created in 1943 by William Morris, also known as
foreign language in order to process their applications.Lord Nuffield. He was the founder of Morris Motors.
The decision made at the Standing Conference onHis original target was to "advance social well being,
University Entrance in 1966 ended a hundred year oldparticularly through research and practical experiment.
requirement which gave access to higher education.The Foundation aims to achieve this by supporting
This can be considered as undermining the status ofwork which will bring about improvements in society,
languages. Monolingualism from then on becameand which is founded on careful reflection and
acceptable even from the people who were at theinformed by objective and reliable evidence." (
time believed to be the 'creme de la creme' of theThe foundation's income is based on returns of
nation.investments, which makes it totally independent from
Some highly regarded universities such as Cambridgethe Government. It implies that the inquiries, research
tried to carry on with the Modern Languageand reports are objective and unprejudiced. The
prerequisite in order to be more selective, and tofoundation provides grants for various projects and
have on their rolls candidates of very high academicsupports some scientists and social scientists. Lately,
competences. However, they were prevented fromthey have launched programmes to develop the
doing so, as it was stated in the Cambridgeaccess to justice for all; they have instigated a
University Reporter, issue 335/109, 17 January 1979:programme on child protection, and have invested
"The University concludes that no university inmoney to further the development of some
isolation could afford to impose entrance requirementCommonwealth countries, especially where education
designed to encourage breadth of study in the sixthand health are concerned. The foundation is doing a
form...they would have to be imposed by thecomparative study about elderly people and the
Department for Education and Science". It isconcerns about their financial problems in later life.
interesting to note that ironically the decision toThey also keep what is called an open door, to fund
suppress the language prerequisite was made themissions that are submitted to them. Ideally, these
same year when the Centre for Information oninnovative projects should be about one of the
Language Teaching was created.foundation's areas of special interest, such as learning
However, the suppression of a basic competenceand social provision, law and society, or science and
requirement in languages can also be interpreted as aeducation.
way of democratising the entrance to university andThe Nuffield foundation has lately worked on
making it accessible to more candidates. Indeed, as"Education 14-19", and how to review the current
languages before the 1960s were mainly taught insystem in order to inform future policies. They have
Grammar Schools and Public Schools, which usedalso researched on speech and language difficulties,
selective entry processes and necessitated parents'to try to enhance the work currently done.
funding, this decision enabled students who attendedAssessment is another priority area. They have
Secondary Modern Schools to apply for universityinvestigated curriculum policies and practices, with a
course.particular attempt to see how Information and
The government tried to take some steps toCommunication Technology is being used in schools.
improve the situation. A feasibility study was carriedIn spring 1998, the Foundation was contacted by
out in 1962, for an early start at learning a Modernlanguage teachers' representatives and delegates
Foreign Language in primary schools. Sir Edward Boylefrom the world of business, to inquire about the
launched a "French from 8" pilot programme, and thesituation of Modern Foreign Languages in the United
Nuffield foundation produced the necessary teachingKingdom. A Committee of ten people appointed by
material. In 1970, an interim report was written by Drthe trustees of the Foundation worked for two
Clare Burstall from the National Foundation foryears on the following questions:o "What capability in
Educational Research, which reveals a consistentlanguages will this country need in the next twenty
"linear correlation" between pupils' performances andyears if it is to fulfill its economic, strategic, social and
parental occupations. The National Foundation forcultural responsibilities and aims and the aspirations of
Educational Research published a final report aboutits citizens?o To what extent do present policies and
the "French from 8" programme in 1974, whicharrangements meet these needs?o What strategic
concluded in the Government deciding to withdrawplanning and initiatives will be required in the light of
their support in funding the scheme...the present position?" (The Nuffield Foundation, 2000:
I.1.c. The birth of new comprehensive schools10).
In the 1960s, the educational system moved towardsThe Committee, headed by Sir Trevor McDonald,
a more child-centred system, focusing on children aspublished a consultative report entitled "Where are
individuals and on kinaesthetic teaching methods. Thiswe going with languages?", and then many surveys
appears to be in direct link with the introduction ofwere carried out by external agencies. After two
comprehensive schools, a new generation of schoolsyears of work in partnership with organisations such
where the eleven-plus exam had no longer to beas the Association for Language Learning, the Centre
taken to gain entry.for Information on Language Teaching and Research,
The developments that happened in the 1960s aremany universities, Local Education Authorities,
due to many factors that were affecting Britishbusiness schools and Chambers of Commerce, they
society. It was a time of relative prosperity. Therepublished a final report and recommendation pamphlet
were no unemployment difficulties and this had aentitled "Languages: the next generation" on 10 May
very positive impact on the community's perception2000.
and their eagerness for fast progress in many fields.This was an extremely straightforward and long
Local Education Authorities were encouragingawaited report, which had strong significance for a
innovations within schools.number of professionals both in the business sphere
The idea of comprehensive education, which impliesand in the education field. It gained mixed critiques
that all students attend a common school rather thanfrom the papers; one of the Times educational
having to sit the eleven-plus exam, which was areporters reacted quite negatively and doomed some
selective process to determine whether the childof the recommendations as mere utopia: "However,
could enter a secondary modern, a grammar or ait remains to be seen whether the Nuffield report will
specialist school, came rather late to the Unitedhelp to ease our national embarrassment. Its authors
Kingdom. Other European countries had alreadyare unrealistic in asking that all university applicants sit
adapted their education system to the changinga foreign language competency test, but they are
society generated by World War II and itsright to call for more language learning in junior
aftermath. Between 1945 and the beginning of theschools, specialist primary schools, and improved
1950s, some Local Education Authorities suggestedlanguage teaching in secondaries." (TES, 10th of May
the creation of comprehensive schools but the2000). This statement expresses mixed feelings
Government was extremely reluctant to this idea andabout some aspects of the report, and is quite
decided to even strengthen the system in favour ofopinionated as far as secondary schools are
Grammar Schools.concerned.
By the early 1960s, the Labour government changedThe Nuffield Languages Inquiry's final report reached
its plans and became favourable to comprehensivea number of conclusions from its main findings:o
schools and started to suggest the abolition of the"English native speakers tend to rely on the fact that
eleven plus exam. As society was prosperous andtheir language is being spoken all over the world.
the middle class expanding, public opinion wasHowever, in the current economic context, business
approved of a new generation of schools. Themeetings can not be held relying on the benevolence
current system was seen as very unequal, benefitingof potential partners who accept to speak a foreign
boys more than girls, and the middle-class more thanlanguage to communicate.o There is a lack of
the working-class.proficiency in one or more languages within the
The 1964 Labour manifesto for the General electionUnited Kingdom human resources. Many foreigners
put great emphasis on abolishing the eleven plushave the opportunity of finding employment in the
exam and on developing comprehensive schools;country whereas it does not seem to happen much
however, after winning the elections the Governmentthe other way round.o Languages are not taught
did not require Local Education Authorities to goefficiently in secondary schools, and the number of
comprehensive. Therefore, comprehensive schoolslanguages offered is too limited. Often, Modern
started to exist alongside Grammar Schools. TheForeign Languages are presented as irrelevant even
Government tried to further develop their action plan,within schools. The level of achievement is too low.o
but it never managed to pass an Act, as Labour lostThe post 16 provision for languages is too specialised
the General Elections in 1970.and needs to broaden up; after sitting the GCSE,
Although the project did not completely reach its90% of students drop the language that they had
initial target, many secondary schools decided tobeen learning.o Government initiatives are not
become non selective. Some of the Grammar schoolsconsistent throughout the compulsory schooling years
having a direct grant from the Government wentand there is no transition managed with the
comprehensive, as they only had one otheruniversities.o The tuition of languages starts too late
alternative which was to turn into fully privatein the child's development and it would be much more
schools.beneficial from an earlier age.o There is a crisis in the
In 1969, the Department for Education issued Circularnumbers on rolls in Modern Foreign Languages
18/69, compelling teachers of Modern Foreigndepartments at university.o There is a lack of
Languages to complete a course of professionalqualified languages teachers, and the previous point
training to teach in maintained schools. It was seen asimplies that there will not be an increase in the
vital to address the lack of competence in thenumber of new staff".
classroom, particularly, since the first GeneralThe Committee working on this report, among whom
Certificate of Education Ordinary Level in ModernSir John Boyd, of Churchill College, Cambridge, made
Foreign Languages had been introduced in 1964. Theproposals to alleviate the situation. Although the
Department for Education had also published a circularreport was originally an appeal made by various non
the same year (2/64) stressing the importance ofgovernmental groups, the Committee addressed
developing the teaching and learning of languages,directly the Government in their proposals. The profile
considering the economic and political context, andof Modern Foreign Languages must be raised within
the need to be competitive in international andBritish society. Speaking more than one language
European business. Indeed, the United Kingdom wasmust become a priority. In order to do so, a
trying to become a member of the Common MarketGovernment representative should be appointed to
and efforts had to be made in all areas to try towork specifically on this issue. Languages should be
obtain a positive answer, which they eventuallytaught to pupils from the age of seven, at an age
gained in 1973, when Britain entered the Europeanwere there are no inhibitions and children have an
Economic Community.intrinsic motivation for learning. The teaching and
In 1977, Her Majesty's Inspectorate (HMI) publishedlearning of Modern Foreign Languages in secondary
the report "11-16: the Red Book", suggesting toschools needs to be improved. Students should have
include a Modern Foreign Language within the corethe necessary skills to learn another language later in
curriculum. They advised to teach a language fourlife. The curriculum has to be revisited, and there is a
periods a week in a forty-period week. The samegreat need for differentiation in approaches and
year, HMI carried out a survey, "Modern Languages incontents so that every individual student can benefit
Comprehensive Schools", which reached alarmingfrom the experience of learning a language.
conclusions: two out of three students starting aThe report also advises to abrogate the decision
language at the age of 11 were dropping it at themade in 1966, which revoked the need for skills in a
age of 14. Only one out of ten pupils reached thelanguage to enter university. However, there should
General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level passbe alternative courses in languages for 16 to 19 year
grade after five years of studying the language.olds who do not wish to specialise in languages, but
The report also mentioned the lack of professionalwho would still like to have some level of
competence of teachers who did not plan theircompetence. Information and Communication
lessons adequately, the absence of schemes ofTechnology, which is in full development within
work, the fact that class objectives were not clear,schools, has to be part of the teaching of a Modern
and that the lessons were not challenging enough.Foreign Language, and the latter should become a
Although teachers were obviously partly responsible"key skill" as Numeracy, Literacy or Information and
for the situation, they had to face new difficultiesCommunication Technology are already.
brought in by comprehensive schools. The groupsThe key message of the Nuffield Inquiry Committee
they taught were mainly in mixed ability; and thisis related to policies that the Government would have
learning context implied the use of differentiation byto undertake to improve standards in education. "The
challenging more able students and helping studentsnational strategy for languages should provide a
having learning difficulties. The emphasis was nocoherent and consistent path of language learning
longer on writing skills, as had been the casefrom early childhood throughout life. To lay sound
previously. They had to adapt their teachingfoundations for this path, learning for all children
techniques to meet these new needs.should start in primary school and become a
Margaret Thatcher's first Education Act, which wassustained dimension of their entire school education
published the very same year when she became(...). The government should make arrangements for
Prime Minister, gave back the right to Local Educationthe development of a national framework to define
Authorities to select pupils for secondary schoollevels of language competence and provide a set of
entrance. She revoked the Education Act issued byrobust grade descriptors for levels of attainment to
the Labour government in 1976. She also decidedwhich all language qualifications should be connected."
that the Government should control the school(The Nuffield Foundation, 2000: 94).
curriculum.So, the Nuffield Inquiry final report tried to tackle the
I.2. Significant changes: 1985 - 1996issues that had to be dealt with in order to meet the
"The irresistible rise of English as a vehicle forcountry's linguistic needs at the beginning of the 21st
international communication made it easy to arguecentury. In 2001, the trustees of the Foundation
that the educational cost of producing a low level ofestablished the Nuffield Language Programme to
communicative skill was too high to be justified in afurther develop the findings and more importantly the
curriculum under pressure from physical and humanrecommendations given. Their aim was to help to go
sciences. The motivation of the "new" learners, whenfrom theory to practice, by working alongside the
a modern language (almost always French) was madeGovernment and various agencies that had to be
compulsory in the comprehensive schools, was low,involved in the process to make it functional, such as
with a 60% drop out rate, which had a catastrophiclanguages associations and business advisers. They
effect on the morale of teachers." (Hawkins,wanted to contribute to the project by giving their
1996:325). This is the analysis made by Hawkins ofexpertise in the upcoming political debates, to
the speech delivered by George Perren, director ofpromote languages within the community. Although
Centre for Information on Language Teaching, inthey wished to play a role in the birth of new
1976 at Kings College in London.strategies, they also had decided that their
In 1985, the Department for Education andinvolvement should not exceed a period of two
Employment published a document entitled "Betteryears, after which it would be up to the Government
Schools", which suggested that most students into follow through and implement the proposals.
secondary schools should receive a course in Modern