The Digital Divide

The Digital Divide:generating a digital inequality. A government ICT
Electronic Government or E-Government is thecenter is more likely to have limited computers raising
application of information and communicationthe competition of which the less advantaged loses.
technologies (ICT) with the intention or purpose ofA person's innovative practice is influenced by the
upgrading and presenting government services tonumber of people in their network since the more
citizens, the public sector, private segment and theeducated and experienced people can influence the
non-profit organizations globally. Digital divide is theperson positively thereby encouraging their innovation.
terminology used to refer to the gap separating theThe presence of computers at home gives more
social classes as concerns their knowledge andICT benefits to the rich than the poor.
accessibility to modern technology especially asThe methodology used here involves use of the
regards the computers and information technologiesplanned behavioral model to examine factors that
the internet inclusive. The digital divide draws aaffect user acceptance. Several people in the
separation line between the wealthy and the poor,community are supplied with Internet by the
developed nations and developing nations andgovernment on the basis of their social status and a
between the blacks and the whites.survey is conducted and data analyzed indicating the
The E-Government and the digital divide aredifference in user acceptance between the groups.
essentially interrelated. With the increasing populationsUlitirian results, availability, attitude, ease of use and
and the consequent need for government servicessocial composition show a heavy effect on the
by the public, information technology (IT) is anresults, while the government has no effect.
essential tool used to distribute and present servicesDigital Inclusiveness by Lam and Lee (2006) is an
to people with ease, thereby boosting productivityarticle exploring methods of having efficacy in
and efficiency. However, the information technologyenabling older adults digital services accessibility. The
in the government won't have any significance ifstudy shows how countries such as the United
those who are intended to benefit from it haveStates, Japan, U.K. and Singapore implement means in
limited or no access to the service or are not able towhich their citizens access computers by providing
utilize the service.training programs to the general public and introducing
The first consideration for the implementation ofcommunity wide computer facilities (Lam & Lee,
E-Government is making all public offices2006).
computerized so as to enable them build a capacityTraining provisions on computer services and the
for efficient service delivery and yield betterintroduction of computer centers in the community
governance catalyzed by technology. The secondwill guarantee computer access by everyone. Older
aspect to consider is the availability of citizen centricadults comprise of a group of people who may have
services by using the digital media. This may includeno interest in using computer services even when
establishing interactive government portals.offered the community computers and trained on
Currently, the nations with admirable e-governancetheir use. The research focuses on studying the rate
schemes include New Zealand, Singapore and Canada.of willing use of computers by older adults. The study
E-Government in the United States was particularlyalso helps to determine the perception of the old in
facilitated by the 1998 Government Paperworkcreating a digitalized society (Constantine, 2009).
Elimination Act as well as by President Clinton'sQuestionnaires are used in this survey to make the
Memorandum on E-Government on December 17,targets answer the questions without fear of
1999. The memorandum required that the mostnegative information. Lab experiments would provide
commonly used 500 forms by the citizens be madethe information on the understanding of computers
available online by December 2000. The memorandumby the old and their interest to learn about the
further instructed agencies to formulate a securecomputers (Edward, 2002). A margin of error is likely
E-Government infrastructure.to occur however as is the case of sampled research
The world wide digital divide is not diminishing as(Constantine, 2009). Some interviewees may give
quickly in spite of the complacency andinsincere answers in order to please those asking in
misconceptions as inferred by researchers Fink,fear that they would otherwise miss the services.
Kenny, Samuelson and Compaine. These researchersThe lab method may appear to the target group as
feel that the global digital divide is ending while otherthough they are being tested for brightness hence
argues that the digital divide never existed. There arethey may provide unreliable information for the
also those who believe that there is less importancefuture. Selection of the target group should have
to intervene on the matter, just as it is in the gapbeen based on education and occupation rather than
between the poor and the rich. Such perceptions arejust the age (Edward, 2002). The questionnaire
deceptive and influential to the interventionistsurvey should be aimed at obtaining specific
strategy attitude. This indicates that lessinformation on the interest and usage of computers.
consideration is given to the digital divide makingWireless technologies are provided by municipalities to
nations and their citizens miss the advantages ofenhance access to the community including those
information and communication technology.who are physically challenged and those on the
According to the A Nation Online: How Americas Aredisadvantaged side of the digital divide. The municipal
Expanding Their Use of the Internet (NTIA, 2002)WiFi is provided at very low costs or free of charge
article, the optimistic digital divide researchers into the society. This research was done to determine
America are portrayed to argue that persons fromthe level of accessibility and sensitivity of municipal
poor backgrounds were making use of the Internetwireless systems. The effectiveness of aims in
than those from wealthy families between 1998 andeliminating the digital divide on the basis of disability is
2001. The article shows that Internet and computerfocused to determine how the policies toward the
literacy and application are growing much fasterdisabled fair and the legal insinuations of municipal WiFi
among the poor and marginal groups and the digitalsystems. People with disabilities being already
divide is narrowing rapidly. The article further arguesaffected with discrepancies in income and education,
that the digital divide is closing independently just as itextra marginalization of their communication and
is the case with automobiles.information accessibility brings about huge hindrances
According to World Bank researchers Kenny and Fink,to their accessibility to important information needs,
there is likelihood for poor nations to adoptand communal participation (Baker et al, 2009).
information technology much faster than developedDigital government and its effectiveness in public
nations. They argue that the growth rate ofmanagement reform by Asgarkhani (2005) highlights
information technology in developing countries isthe usefulness of ICT education particularly on
much more likely to expand than in the developedtertiary sector. The study looks at ways in which
nations. Any minor absolute increases in Internet usetertiary ICT educators develop learner's skill and
by the developing countries will be received asmake them ready for job. The ICT skills acquired by
phenomenally huge growth rates, a suggestion thatthe students are compared with what was required
the digital divide will drastically reduce (James, 2008,by the industry. The skills the students expect to
p. 56-57).learn are consistent with what they are taught.
To close the digital divide, developing countries'There are inconsistencies in their expectations in
governments should be actively involved in thecomparison to job market requirements. This study
efforts of bridging the gap (The Economist (2005).cannot be reliable since the results may not be true
The digital divide in the United States has notablywith all institutions and all ICT students.
fallen. According to a Census Bureau survey, 37% ofAccording to Baker & Panagopoulos (2003),
families in 1997 earning between $10,000 and $15,000e-government is still complex in various perspectives
annually made use of computers. The number roseincluding its design, practical implementation,
to 47% by 2001. 81% of families earning overawareness and effective design of responsive
$75,000 annually utilized computers in 1997 and thispolicies. With the rapidly rising technological and
number rose to 88% by 2001 (Samuelson, 2002).political implications, variations in the e-government
On the basis of historical analogy, Fink and Kennyprocedures are evident. Their research overviews
argue that growth rates in computer usage areexamples of various participation related
bound to remain higher among the developing nations.e-government applications focusing on the relationship
It is unclear whether these differences in growthbetween state e-government projects and essential
rates between the developing and developed worlddemographic, cultural or economic variables. Population
will carry on in the future, equalize, or become theof a state appears to be associated with the
opposite as time goes (James, 2008). Fink and Kennyexistence of e-government applications, very little of
base their analogy on past growth rates ofthe anticipated relationships appear to function in
technology accessibility and diminishing accessibilityincompatible manners based on the dataset used.
gaps soon after establishment of new technology. ItExtra research basing on a larger dataset and more
is not possible to rely on the Internet, television andvigorous instrumentation is necessary.
telephone technologies to cover technology entirely.Universal access to ICT would result to a world wide
Fink and Kenny use simplistic predicting methodologycommunity of interaction, business, and learning
rather than extrapolating between future rates ofleading to higher living standards and upgraded social
growth of Internet accessibility from two distinctwelfare. The digital divide is however a threat to
technologies (James, 2008).these results making most public policy makers
The accessibility to the Internet does not contributediscuss the most effective way to close the gap
to the digital divide. Instead, the digital divide is(Bélanger & Carter, 2009). Most of the
influenced by the utilization of the Internet andresearch focuses on who has access to ICT and at
literacy necessary to make use of the Internet.times how the ICT is applied by those who access it.
Some technologies like mobile phones, telephone, andBélanger and Carter examine the affected and the
radio do not demand any skills in order to use them,effects of the digital divide at three levels; the
while the Internet requires knowledge of computers,individual level, organizational level and national level.
language skills and technical aptitude (James, 2008).Gascó (2005) in his article Exploring the
Besides, a person has to be able to contextualize thee-government gap in South America addresses the
information availed on the Internet and obtainunderdevelopment of the e-governance in South
information meaningful to their specific needs.America. He feels that the digital divide is prominent in
The Economist was authored somehow with anLatin American nations and that implementation of
intention to challenge the beliefs of those who argueefficient actions is required to improve the
that the digital divide is swiftly closing. It is arguedaccessibility and utilization of ICT in communal
that the poor nations are on the dark side in that asservices and e-governance within the South American
the technology advances, the demand for advancedregion.
literacy and skills continues to rise, thereby wideningHampton (2007) in his article Neighborhoods in the
the digital divide rather than closing it.network society: the e-neighbors study examines
James (2008) in his article is against the notion thatinternet as part of daily neighborhood interactions and
digital divide does not exist or is closing up. However,the contexts in which the use of Internet assists in
he lacks quantitative evidence and experimentalthe creation of local social ties. Internet and
evidence to reinforce his opposition. He deduces thatcommunity researches show that ICT presents new
A Nation Online: How Americas Are Expanding Theirchances for social interaction, as well as increasing
Use of the Internet (NTIA, 2002) article truth is notprivacy by enclosing people in their closets. The study
certain, but the claims generate complacencyfocuses on closing the gap between the parochial and
towards a digital divide thereby diverting focus fromelectronic worlds. Experience in using the Internet
the matter. It would have been better for James toincreases the dimension of local social networks and
prove the incorrectness of the information ratheremail communication with local networks.
than just alleging that the information may be true orHelbig et al (2009) article Understanding the
false. He should have noted on the data's reliance oncomplexity of Electronic government: Implications
information based on America rather than the worldfrom the digital divide literature has it that
at large.theoretically and empirically, e-government and the
James (2008) gets support from Mason and Hackerdigital divide are interrelated. Studies concerning the
(2003) in that information technology needs usere-government and the digital divide carry crucial
competency different to radio and television and thatparallels and potential interactions essential in
only very few individuals in developing nations havecomprehending e-government initiatives and policies in
these skills. Though the digital divide may be fadinga better perspective subsequently for enhancing
fast in some countries, it still does exist. Less hasefficient digital schemes. Model and theory
been done to determine the impacts of thedevelopments, understanding users and determinants
introduction of Information Communicationof demand are some recommendations inferred from
Technology in the third world and more practicalthis research.
research is necessary so as to realize the needs ofJames, (2008) in his article Digital divide complacency:
developing nations' inhabitants. James argues that amisconceptions and dangers discuss the global digital
global perspective should be adopted whendivide. The article confronts the perceptions that
considering the digital divide and that looking beyondinformation technology can be easily equalized with
America would be the way out to help others closethe earlier dispersal of consumer durable goods, and
the digital divide.that the divide can be varnished by redefining the
The Understanding Digital Inequality article by Keil etmatter, and that the global divide can be examined in
al (2008) argues that the general behavioral modelsabsence of basic knowledge in innovation studies,
user approval for the socio economicallytechnology and development, and the dismissal of
underprivileged and socio economically privileged existprocess modernizations.
and relate to the digital disparity. In their view, theThe challenges of redressing the digital divide by
authors of this article feel the digital divide is the gapKvasny & Keil (2006) evaluates the works by
separating the advantaged and the disadvantaged inAtlanta and LaGrange cities in redressing the digital
terms of Information and Communication Technologydivide. They analyzed how the target populations and
(ICT) and the utilization of information obtained fromservice providers responded to the two initiatives,
ICT. Being present in many countries, digital inequalityhow these responses worked to reproduce the
differentiates the developed countries and thedigital divide, and the teaching for future digital divide
underdeveloped countries as concerns ICT.programs. They found a reinforcement of the status
Digital inequality is brought about by some socioquo. However, there lacked mechanisms for
economic factors such as the degree or the ability toadvancement.  They inferred that Atlanta and
obtain education and income. The government'sLaGrange programs could be classified as successful
move to present access to technology and creationsince they provided access and basic computer
of conditions under which the technology will operateliteracy to people.
are crucial. To make the project successful, theIn conclusion, the digital divide still exists in most
government must realize the citizen's usercountries, and for there to be an effective
acceptance. Understanding Digital Inequality researche-governance, more efforts in providing the
is conducted to determine the significance of theresources and knowledge to the public as regards
citizen's user acceptance of information technologyinformation technology must be put in place.
initiatives offered by the government.Awareness on the use and the benefits of
The methodology used comprises of survey tools fore-governance should be created in the community.
obtaining data from a particular community utilizingReferences:
the government's Internet project and then analyzingAsgarkhani, M. (2005). Digital government and its
the results. The factors contributing to the differenceeffectiveness in public management reform:
in ICT application among the groups include theA local government perspective.  Public Management
simplicity of use and the confidence, and they carryReview, 7 (3) 465 – 487.
much weight on user acceptance. The theory ofBaker, P., Hanson, J., &Myhill, W.N. (2009). The
planned behavior used is applied in the analysis of thepromise of municipal WiFi and failed policiesof inclusion:
after-implementation effects of the ICT projects inThe disability divide. Information Polity 12, 47-59.
the two groups.Baker, P. & Panagopoulos, C. (2003). Great
Several factors in the model affecting the userexpectations: The promise of digitalgovernmentinthe
acceptance either constructively or unconstructivelyAmerican states. American Political Science
include perceived behaviors, subjective norms andAssociation, Philadelphia, 1-21.
attitude. Attitude depends on the ulitirian factor whichBélanger, F. & Carter, L. ( 2009). The impact
measures the significance of using ICT and theof the digital divide on e-government use.
hedonic factor that measures the enjoyment derivedCommunications of the ACM, 52(4), 132-135.
from the use of ICT. Utilitarian results are linked withDewan, S. & Riggins, F.J. (2005).The digital divide:
the socio benefited whereby ICT is utilized for thecurrent and future research directions
correct reasons, while the socio economicallyJournal of the Association for Information Systems,
underprivileged employ ICT for entertainment or6(12), 298-335.
pleasure. This gap emerges because theGascó, M. (2005). Exploring the e-government gap in
disadvantaged use ICT for pleasure while theSouth America. Intl Journal of Public
advantaged use ICT to obtain knowledge or forAdministration, 28, 683–701.
occupational reasons.Hammond, A. L. (2004). Digitally empowered
The distinction is a product of the social economicallydevelopment. Foreign Affairs, 80(2), 96-102.
privileged persons being more learned and having ICTHampton, K. (2007). Neighborhoods in the network
accessibility, giving them a better chance to use thesociety: the e-neighbors study   Information,
technology. Friends spend much time togetherCommunication & Society, 10(5), 714–748.
exchanging information and are thus more likely toHawkins, E.T., & Hawkins, K.A. (2003). Bridging
influence an individual's innovative behavior asLatin America's digital divide: governmentpolicies and
opposed to the government.internet access. Journalism & Mass
The government can be influential by involving thecommunication Quarterly, autumn, 646-
community in discussions and training, and thus avail665.
ICT to the community cheaply thereby benefiting theHelbig, N. Gil-Garcí, J. R., Ferro, E. (2009, January).
two groups. In so doing, the government will lowerUnderstanding the complexity ofelectronic
the digital inequality, and it may use methodical meansgovernment: Implications from the digital divide
to promote awareness and interest in theliterature.   Government
community. This will create a positive relationship toInformation Quarterly, 26(1), 89-97.
the subjective standards of the privileged andHsieh, P., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding
underprivileged in the society.digital inequality: comparing continued usebehavioral
Confidence being another factor can affect bothmodels of the socio-economically advantaged and
groups constructively and non-constructively.disadvantaged. MIS
Confidence measures the execution of ICT projectsQuarterly, 32(1), 97-126.
and a person's behavioral organization and affectsI-Ways (2006). Breaking barriers to e-government.
ICT application in the society. Low confidence affectsDigest of Electronic Government Policy and
more the socio economically disadvantaged than theRegulation, 29, 205-217.
socio economically advantaged making theJames, J. ( 2008). Digital divide complacency:
less-privileged experience difficulties accessing ICT,misconceptions and dangers.  The Information
hence the digital divide. The ease or difficulty in usingSociety, 24, 54–61.
technology affects one's belief and subsequentLam, J., & Lee, M. (2006).  Digital inclusiveness:
control on technology, though the socio economicallyLongitudinal study of internet adoption byolder adults.
disadvantaged are more affected by this. This is dueJournal of Management Information System, 22(4),
to the fact that the socio economically privileged are177-206.
more educated and thus able to cope withMcNeal, R., Hale, K., & Dotterweich, L. (2008).
sophisticated features of the technology.Citizen-governmentinteraction and the
Technology is more theoretical than practical in mostInternet: Expectations and accomplishments in
government initiatives. This renders availability, acontact, quality, and trust.
barrier among the socio economically under privileged